465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16003976)
41. Long-term operation of submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) for the treatment of synthetic wastewater containing styrene as volatile organic compound (VOC): Effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT).
Fallah N; Bonakdarpour B; Nasernejad B; Alavi Moghadam MR
J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jun; 178(1-3):718-24. PubMed ID: 20207478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Membrane bioreactor process of organic wastewater from brassylic acid manufacturing plant.
Wu ZC; Zeng P; Wang SF; Gao TY
J Environ Sci (China); 2001 Apr; 13(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 11590734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of the performance of submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and submerged membrane adsorption bioreactor (SMABR).
Guo W; Vigneswaran S; Ngo HH; Xing W; Goteti P
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Mar; 99(5):1012-7. PubMed ID: 17499503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Adsorption and removal at low atrazine concentration in an MBR pilot plant.
Buttiglieri G; Migliorisi L; Malpei F
Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(7):1334-40. PubMed ID: 21508534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of MBR effluent characteristics for reuse purposes.
Oota S; Murakami T; Takemura K; Noto K
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):441-6. PubMed ID: 16004006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor (MBR): sludge cake formation and fouling characteristics.
Ping Chu H; Li XY
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 May; 90(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 15800862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Combined effects of EPS and HRT enhanced biofouling on a submerged and hybrid PAC-MF membrane bioreactor.
Khan MM; Takizawa S; Lewandowski Z; Habibur Rahman M; Komatsu K; Nelson SE; Kurisu F; Camper AK; Katayama H; Ohgaki S
Water Res; 2013 Feb; 47(2):747-57. PubMed ID: 23218247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Removal of bulk dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and trace organic compounds by bank filtration and artificial recharge.
Grünheid S; Amy G; Jekel M
Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3219-28. PubMed ID: 16024062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Relation between EPS adherence, viscoelastic properties, and MBR operation: Biofouling study with QCM-D.
Sweity A; Ying W; Ali-Shtayeh MS; Yang F; Bick A; Oron G; Herzberg M
Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(19):6430-40. PubMed ID: 22014563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Indigenous somatic coliphage removal from a real municipal wastewater by a submerged membrane bioreactor.
Wu J; Li H; Huang X
Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1853-62. PubMed ID: 20045169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Performance and fouling characteristics of different pore-sized submerged ceramic membrane bioreactors (SCMBR).
Jin L; Ng HY; Ong SL
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2213-8. PubMed ID: 19494461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Treatment of bactericide wastewater by combined process chemical coagulation, electrochemical oxidation and membrane bioreactor.
Han WQ; Wang LJ; Sun XY; Li JS
J Hazard Mater; 2008 Mar; 151(2-3):306-15. PubMed ID: 17662522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Control of membrane fouling in membrane bioreactor process by coagulant addition.
Mishima I; Nakajima J
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(7):1255-62. PubMed ID: 19380989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Development of an integrated membrane process for water reclamation.
Lew CH; Hu JY; Song LF; Lee LY; Ong SL; Ng WJ; Seah H
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):455-63. PubMed ID: 16004008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Treatment of kraft evaporator condensate using a thermophilic submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor.
Liao BQ; Xie K; Lin HJ; Bertoldo D
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2177-83. PubMed ID: 20418612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment.
González S; Petrovic M; Barceló D
Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 17123581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Accumulation of biopolymer clusters in a submerged membrane bioreactor and its effect on membrane fouling.
Wang XM; Li XY
Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(4-5):855-62. PubMed ID: 17889249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Performance of a membrane bioreactor used for the treatment of wastewater contaminated with heavy metals.
Katsou E; Malamis S; Loizidou M
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Mar; 102(6):4325-32. PubMed ID: 21269823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Removal mechanisms of 17β-estradiol and 17α-ethinylestradiol in membrane bioreactors.
Yang W; Zhou H; Cicek N
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(6):1263-9. PubMed ID: 22828304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Why low powdered activated carbon addition reduces membrane fouling in MBRs.
Remy M; Potier V; Temmink H; Rulkens W
Water Res; 2010 Feb; 44(3):861-7. PubMed ID: 19818984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
