304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16003990)
1. Comparison of treatment efficiency of submerged nanofiltration membrane bioreactors using cellulose triacetate and polyamide membrane.
Choi JH; Fukushi K; Yamamoto K
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):305-12. PubMed ID: 16003990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Membrane bioreactors for water reclamation.
Tao G; Kekre K; Wei Z; Lee TC; Viswanath B; Seah H
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):431-40. PubMed ID: 16004005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a long-term operation of a submerged nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF MBR) for advanced wastewater treatment.
Choi JH; Fukushi K; Ng HY; Yamamoto K
Water Sci Technol; 2006; 53(6):131-6. PubMed ID: 16749449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of flux enhancing polymer on the characteristics of sludge in membrane bioreactor process.
Yoon SH; Collins JH; Musale D; Sundararajan S; Tsai SP; Hallsby GA; Kong JF; Koppes J; Cachia P
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):151-7. PubMed ID: 16003973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hyperbranched polyethyleneimine induced cross-linking of polyamide-imide nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for effective removal of ciprofloxacin.
Sun SP; Hatton TA; Chung TS
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 May; 45(9):4003-9. PubMed ID: 21456576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of sludge characteristics and PCR-DGGE based microbial diversity of nanofiltration and microfiltration membrane bioreactors.
Choi JH; Lee SH; Fukushi K; Yamamoto K
Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(8):1543-50. PubMed ID: 17258282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Membrane bioreactors as core technology for water loop closure in a maltery.
De Wever H; Boënne W; Danau M; Vanderspiegel N; Lambert K; Hardy K; Limbos J
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1805-8. PubMed ID: 18547934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ion implantation: effect on flux and rejection properties of NF membranes.
Abitoye JO; Mukherjee JP; Jones K
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Sep; 39(17):6487-93. PubMed ID: 16190203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of membrane characteristics on the performance of membrane bioreactors for oily wastewater treatment.
Mafirad S; Mehrnia MR; Sarrafzadeh MH
Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(5):1154-60. PubMed ID: 22214065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of biofilm formation on membrane performance in submerged membrane bioreactors.
Mafirad S; Mehrnia MR; Azami H; Sarrafzadeh MH
Biofouling; 2011 May; 27(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 21604217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of biofouling mechanisms between cellulose triacetate (CTA) and thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide forward osmosis membranes in osmotic membrane bioreactors.
Wang X; Zhao Y; Yuan B; Wang Z; Li X; Ren Y
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Feb; 202():50-8. PubMed ID: 26700758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of salt accumulation in the bioreactor on the performance of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+Reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation.
Tay MF; Lee S; Xu H; Jeong K; Liu C; Cornelissen ER; Wu B; Chong TH
Water Res; 2020 Mar; 170():115352. PubMed ID: 31812816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rejection of trace organic compounds by high-pressure membranes.
Kim TU; Amy G; Drewes JE
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):335-44. PubMed ID: 16003994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MARAPUR--a new process combination for the optimization of MBR.
Klegraf F; Lahnsteiner J
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(11):2101-7. PubMed ID: 19092185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposing a method for online permeability monitoring in membrane bioreactors.
Joss A; Böhler M; Wedi D; Siegrist H
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):497-506. PubMed ID: 19633393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High retention membrane bioreactors: challenges and opportunities.
Luo W; Hai FI; Price WE; Guo W; Ngo HH; Yamamoto K; Nghiem LD
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Sep; 167():539-46. PubMed ID: 24996563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MBR/RO/ozone processes for TFT-LCD industrial wastewater treatment and recycling.
Chen TK; Ni CH; Chan YC; Lu MC
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):411-9. PubMed ID: 16004003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis of surfactants influencing attachment of a Mycobacterium sp. to cellulose acetate and aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes.
Campbell P; Srinivasan R; Knoell T; Phipps D; Ishida K; Safarik J; Cormack T; Ridgway H
Biotechnol Bioeng; 1999 Sep; 64(5):527-44. PubMed ID: 10404233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
