BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16004005)

  • 21. Function of dynamic membrane in self-forming dynamic membrane coupled bioreactor.
    Wu Y; Huang X; Wen X; Chen F
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):107-14. PubMed ID: 16003968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Peak flux performance and microbial removal by selected membrane bioreactor systems.
    Hirani ZM; DeCarolis JF; Adham SS; Jacangelo JG
    Water Res; 2010 Apr; 44(8):2431-40. PubMed ID: 20144839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. MBR-technology in municipal wastewater treatment: challenging the traditional treatment technologies.
    van der Roest HF; van Bentem AG; Lawrence DP
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):273-80. PubMed ID: 12361021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Organic and detergent degradation in combined O3/UF for domestic laundry wastewater reclamation.
    Seo GT; Lee TS; Kim JT; Yoon CH; Park HG; Hong SC
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):331-6. PubMed ID: 15537022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of membrane type and material on performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Choi JH; Ng HY
    Chemosphere; 2008 Mar; 71(5):853-9. PubMed ID: 18164743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor (MBR): sludge cake formation and fouling characteristics.
    Ping Chu H; Li XY
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 May; 90(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 15800862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Membranebioreactor with external membranes.
    Jonkers C; Carrette R; De Lathouwer J; Thoeye C
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):87-93. PubMed ID: 15954567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Membrane bioreactor process of organic wastewater from brassylic acid manufacturing plant.
    Wu ZC; Zeng P; Wang SF; Gao TY
    J Environ Sci (China); 2001 Apr; 13(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 11590734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The optimum operational condition of membrane bioreactor (MBR): cost estimation of aeration and sludge treatment.
    Yoon SH; Kim HS; Yeom IT
    Water Res; 2004 Jan; 38(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 14630101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The removal of residual organic matter from biologically treated swine wastewater using membrane bioreactor process with powdered activated carbon.
    Whang GD; Cho YM; Park H; Jang JG
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):451-7. PubMed ID: 15137457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hanced biological phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors.
    Adam C; Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Buisson H; Krauma M
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):281-6. PubMed ID: 12361022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Application of membrane bioreactor system with full scale plant on livestock wastewater.
    Kim H; Kim HS; Yeom IT; Chae YB
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):465-71. PubMed ID: 16004009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of membrane bioreactor performance via residence time distribution: effects of membrane configuration and mixing.
    Wang Y; Ong KW; Brannock MW; Leslie GL
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 18309212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Indigenous somatic coliphage removal from a real municipal wastewater by a submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Wu J; Li H; Huang X
    Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1853-62. PubMed ID: 20045169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The feasibility of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation: Comparison with ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor (UF-MBR)+RO process.
    Tay MF; Liu C; Cornelissen ER; Wu B; Chong TH
    Water Res; 2018 Feb; 129():180-189. PubMed ID: 29149673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New process for alleviation of membrane fouling of modified hybrid MBR system for advanced domestic wastewater treatment.
    Shuo L; Baozhen W; Hongjun H; Yanping L
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(10):2059-66. PubMed ID: 19039188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of disintegrated sludge recycling on membrane permeability in a membrane bioreactor combined with a turbulent jet flow ozone contactor.
    Hwang BK; Kim JH; Ahn CH; Lee CH; Song JY; Ra YH
    Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1833-40. PubMed ID: 20092865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of the removal of phthalates and other organic pollutants from industrial wastewaters in membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment plants.
    Llop A; Borrull F; Pocurull E
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(9):2425-37. PubMed ID: 19901476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Membrane coagulation bioreactor (MCBR) for drinking water treatment.
    Tian JY; Liang H; Li X; You SJ; Tian S; Li GB
    Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3910-20. PubMed ID: 18674791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.