These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16004005)

  • 41. Performances of a hybrid adsorption/submerged membrane biological process for toxic waste removal.
    Lesage N; Spérandio M; Cabassud C
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):173-80. PubMed ID: 16003976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The application of membrane bioreactors as decentralised systems for removal of endocrine disrupting chemicals and pharmaceuticals.
    Le-Minh N; Coleman HM; Khan SJ; van Luer Y; Trang TT; Watkins G; Stuetz RM
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(5):1081-8. PubMed ID: 20220228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Combined membrane bioreactor (MBR) and reverse osmosis (RO) system for thin-film transistor-liquid crystal display TFT-LCD, industrial wastewater recycling.
    Chen TK; Chen JN
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 15344779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater.
    Munz G; Gualtiero M; Salvadori L; Claudia B; Claudio L
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8559-64. PubMed ID: 18499451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology.
    Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Adam C; Buisson H
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Proposing a method for online permeability monitoring in membrane bioreactors.
    Joss A; Böhler M; Wedi D; Siegrist H
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):497-506. PubMed ID: 19633393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. MARAPUR--a new process combination for the optimization of MBR.
    Klegraf F; Lahnsteiner J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(11):2101-7. PubMed ID: 19092185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Long term operation of high concentration powdered activated carbon membrane bio-reactor for advanced water treatment.
    Seo GT; Moon CD; Chang SW; Lee SH
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(8):81-7. PubMed ID: 15566190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Influence of membrane properties on physically reversible and irreversible fouling in membrane bioreactors.
    Tsuyuhara T; Hanamoto Y; Miyoshi T; Kimura K; Watanabe Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2235-40. PubMed ID: 20418619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Enhanced membrane bioreactor process without chemical cleaning.
    Krause S; Zimmermann B; Meyer-Blumenroth U; Lamparter W; Siembida B; Cornel P
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(10):2575-80. PubMed ID: 20453330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Integrated pretreatment with capacitive deionization for reverse osmosis reject recovery from water reclamation plant.
    Lee LY; Ng HY; Ong SL; Tao G; Kekre K; Viswanath B; Lay W; Seah H
    Water Res; 2009 Oct; 43(18):4769-77. PubMed ID: 19700181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Performance of coarse pore filtration activated sludge system.
    Alavi Moghaddam MR; Satoh H; Mino T
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(11-12):71-6. PubMed ID: 12523735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A real trial of a long-term non-fouling membrane bioreactor for saline sewage treatment.
    Bai P; Wang J; Chen GH
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(7):1519-23. PubMed ID: 21508559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of sludge characteristics and PCR-DGGE based microbial diversity of nanofiltration and microfiltration membrane bioreactors.
    Choi JH; Lee SH; Fukushi K; Yamamoto K
    Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(8):1543-50. PubMed ID: 17258282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Long-term operation of submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) for the treatment of synthetic wastewater containing styrene as volatile organic compound (VOC): Effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT).
    Fallah N; Bonakdarpour B; Nasernejad B; Alavi Moghadam MR
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jun; 178(1-3):718-24. PubMed ID: 20207478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Performance comparison of a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor and a full-scale sequencing batch reactor with sand filtration: treatment of low strength wastewater from a northern Canadian Aboriginal Community.
    Frederickson K; Cicek N
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):483-90. PubMed ID: 16004011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Treatment of domestic sewage by a metal membrane bioreactor.
    Xie YH; Zhu T; Xu CH; Nozaki T; Furukawa K
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(6):1102-8. PubMed ID: 22378009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of powdered activated carbon dosing on sludge characteristics and estrogen removal in membrane bioreactors.
    Yang W; Paetkau M; Cicek N
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2193-8. PubMed ID: 20418614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention times: performance and biomass characteristics.
    Ng HY; Hermanowicz SW
    Water Res; 2005 Mar; 39(6):981-92. PubMed ID: 15766953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.