These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16004040)

  • 21. Effects of red blood cell aggregates dissociation on the estimation of ultrasound speckle image velocimetry.
    Yeom E; Nam KH; Paeng DG; Lee SJ
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Aug; 54(6):1480-7. PubMed ID: 24794508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Phase-shifting algorithms for electronic speckle pattern interferometry.
    Kao CC; Yeh GB; Lee SS; Lee CK; Yang CS; Wu KC
    Appl Opt; 2002 Jan; 41(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11900445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantification of ultrasound correlation-based flow velocity mapping and edge velocity gradient measurement.
    Park DW; Kruger GH; Rubin JM; Hamilton J; Gottschalk P; Dodde RE; Shih AJ; Weitzel WF
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1815-30. PubMed ID: 24065263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial versus temporal phase shifting in electronic speckle-pattern interferometry: noise comparison in phase maps.
    Burke J; Helmers H
    Appl Opt; 2000 Sep; 39(25):4598-606. PubMed ID: 18350049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Depth-resolved whole-field displacement measurement by wavelength-scanning electronic speckle pattern interferometry.
    Ruiz PD; Huntley JM; Wildman RD
    Appl Opt; 2005 Jul; 44(19):3945-53. PubMed ID: 16004039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speckle interferometry with temporal phase evaluation: influence of decorrelation, speckle size, and nonlinearity of the camera.
    Joenathan C; Haible P; Tiziani HJ
    Appl Opt; 1999 Mar; 38(7):1169-78. PubMed ID: 18305728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Incoherent averaging of phase singularities in speckle-shearing interferometry.
    Mantel K; Nercissian V; Lindlein N
    Opt Lett; 2014 Aug; 39(15):4510-3. PubMed ID: 25078215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Phase shifting speckle interferometry for dynamic phenomena.
    Bruno L; Poggialini A
    Opt Express; 2008 Mar; 16(7):4665-70. PubMed ID: 18542563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optical vortex behavior in dynamic speckle fields.
    Kirkpatrick SJ; Khaksari K; Thomas D; Duncan DD
    J Biomed Opt; 2012 May; 17(5):050504. PubMed ID: 22612119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Spatial phase-shift dual-beam speckle interferometry.
    Gao X; Yang L; Wang Y; Zhang B; Dan X; Li J; Wu S
    Appl Opt; 2018 Jan; 57(3):414-419. PubMed ID: 29400790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Additive-subtractive phase-modulated electronic speckle interferometry: analysis of fringe visibility.
    Pouet BF; Krishnaswamy S
    Appl Opt; 1994 Oct; 33(28):6609-16. PubMed ID: 20941200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methods of phase reconstruction for time-averaging electronic speckle pattern interferometry.
    Statsenko T; Chatziioannou V; Moore T; Kausel W
    Appl Opt; 2016 Mar; 55(8):1913-9. PubMed ID: 26974782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of motion tracking in echocardiographic image sequences: influence of system geometry and point-spread function.
    Touil B; Basarab A; Delachartre P; Bernard O; Friboulet D
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Mar; 50(3):373-86. PubMed ID: 19837445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Signal-to-noise based local decorrelation compensation for speckle interferometry applications.
    Molimard J; Cordero R; Vautrin A
    Appl Opt; 2008 Jul; 47(19):3535-42. PubMed ID: 18594601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spatial phase shifting in electronic speckle pattern interferometry: minimization of phase reconstruction errors.
    Bothe T; Burke J; Helmers H
    Appl Opt; 1997 Aug; 36(22):5310-6. PubMed ID: 18259347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Camera influence on the phase-measurement accuracy of a phase-shifting speckle interferometer.
    Maack T; Kowarschik R
    Appl Opt; 1996 Jul; 35(19):3514-24. PubMed ID: 21102743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Path-independent phase unwrapping using phase gradient and total-variation (TV) denoising.
    Huang HY; Tian L; Zhang Z; Liu Y; Chen Z; Barbastathis G
    Opt Express; 2012 Jun; 20(13):14075-89. PubMed ID: 22714472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 3-D correlation-based speckle tracking.
    Chen X; Xie H; Erkamp R; Kim K; Jia C; Rubin JM; O'Donnell M
    Ultrason Imaging; 2005 Jan; 27(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 16003924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of a preconditioned conjugate-gradient algorithm for weighted least-squares unwrapping of digital speckle-pattern interferometry phase maps.
    Kaufmann GH; Galizzi GE; Ruiz PD
    Appl Opt; 1998 May; 37(14):3076-84. PubMed ID: 18273255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantitative measurement of thin phase objects: comparison of speckle deflectometry and defocus-variant lateral shear interferometry.
    Sjodahl M; Amer E
    Appl Opt; 2018 May; 57(14):3645-3652. PubMed ID: 29791330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.