244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16004291)
1. [Willingness to pay for ecosystem services of urban river in Shanghai].
Zhao J; Yang K; Tai J; Wu EN
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2005 Mar; 26(2):5-10. PubMed ID: 16004291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Temporal stability of river ecological restoration based on the assessment of contingent valuation method: a case study of Shanghai urban river].
Zhang YF; Wang D
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2013 Apr; 24(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 23898647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the comprehensive restoration of an urban river: an integrated application of contingent valuation in Shanghai, China.
Zhao J; Liu Q; Lin L; Lv H; Wang Y
Sci Total Environ; 2013 Aug; 458-460():517-26. PubMed ID: 23707722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing local communities’ willingness to pay for river network protection: a contingent valuation study of Shanghai, China.
Shang Z; Che Y; Yang K; Jiang Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2012 Oct; 9(11):3866-82. PubMed ID: 23202821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implicit individual discount rate in China: A contingent valuation study.
Wang H; He J
J Environ Manage; 2018 Mar; 210():51-70. PubMed ID: 29331626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Willingness to pay for public health services in rural Central Java, Indonesia: methodological considerations when using the contingent valuation method.
Shono A; Kondo M; Ohmae H; Okubo I
Soc Sci Med; 2014 Jun; 110():31-40. PubMed ID: 24713191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value orientation and payment for ecosystem services: Perceived detrimental consequences lead to willingness-to-pay for ecosystem services.
Obeng EA; Aguilar FX
J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 206():458-471. PubMed ID: 29107802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An assessment of household willingness to pay for curbside recycling: a comparison of payment card and referendum approaches.
Blaine TW; Lichtkoppler FR; Jones KR; Zondag RH
J Environ Manage; 2005 Jul; 76(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 15854733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Eliciting willingness to pay in obstetrics: comparing a direct and an indirect valuation method for complex health outcomes.
Bijlenga D; Bonsel GJ; Birnie E
Health Econ; 2011 Nov; 20(11):1392-406. PubMed ID: 20967891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services: a distance decay approach to quantify willingness to pay for improvements in Heihe River Basin ecosystems.
Khan SU; Khan I; Zhao M; Chien H; Lu Q; Ali MAS; Khan AA; Fahad S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Aug; 26(24):25247-25261. PubMed ID: 31256403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recreational benefits of urban forests: explaining visitors' willingness to pay in the context of the theory of planned behavior.
Bernath K; Roschewitz A
J Environ Manage; 2008 Nov; 89(3):155-66. PubMed ID: 17720294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental benefits of blue ecosystem services and residents' willingness to pay in Khulna city, Bangladesh.
Haque MN; Saroar M; Fattah MA; Morshed SR
Heliyon; 2022 May; 8(5):e09535. PubMed ID: 35663758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Air quality improvement estimation and assessment using contingent valuation method, a case study in Beijing.
Wang XJ; Zhang W; Li Y; Yang KZ; Bai M
Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Sep; 120(1-3):153-68. PubMed ID: 16770506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of perceived importance of ecosystem services and stated financial constraints on willingness to pay for riparian meadow restoration in Flanders (Belgium).
Chen WY; Aertsens J; Liekens I; Broekx S; De Nocker L
Environ Manage; 2014 Aug; 54(2):346-59. PubMed ID: 24841691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values.
Hanley N; Schläpfer F; Spurgeon J
J Environ Manage; 2003 Jul; 68(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12837258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [WTP guidance technology: a comparison of payment card, single-bounded and double-bounded dichotomous formats for evaluating non-use values of Sanjiang Plain ecotourism water resources].
Chen HG; Wang QD; Li CY
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2014 Sep; 25(9):2709-15. PubMed ID: 25757326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Economic assessment of urban watersheds: developing mechanisms for environmental protection of the Feijão river, São Carlos--SP, Brazil.
Machado FH; Silva LF; Dupas FA; Mattedi AP; Vergara FE
Braz J Biol; 2014 Aug; 74(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 25296217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptions of ecosystem services, disservices and willingness-to-pay for urban green space conservation.
Tian Y; Wu H; Zhang G; Wang L; Zheng D; Li S
J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 260():110140. PubMed ID: 32090834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparing the value of ecological protection in Sanjiang Plain wetland, Northeast China based on the stated preference method.].
Fan ZJ; Ao CL; Mao BQ; Chen HG; Wang XD
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2017 Feb; 28(2):500-508. PubMed ID: 29749158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of factors affecting willingness to pay for cardiovascular disease-related medical services.
Yasunaga H; Ide H; Imamura T; Ohe K
Int Heart J; 2006 Mar; 47(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 16607054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
