These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16004650)

  • 1. Discrimination between dominant and subordinate groups: the positive-negative asymmetry effect and normative processes.
    Amiot CE; Bourhis RY
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2005 Jun; 44(Pt 2):289-308. PubMed ID: 16004650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrimination and the positive-negative asymmetry effect: ideological and normative processes.
    Amiot CE; Bourhis RY
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 May; 29(5):597-608. PubMed ID: 15272993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: categorization, reciprocation, or fear?
    Gaertner L; Insko CA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Jul; 79(1):77-94. PubMed ID: 10909879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intergroup bias.
    Hewstone M; Rubin M; Willis H
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2002; 53():575-604. PubMed ID: 11752497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Being similar versus being equal: intergroup similarity moderates the influence of in-group norms on discrimination and prejudice.
    Gabarrot F; Falomir-Pichastor JM; Mugny G
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 48(Pt 2):253-73. PubMed ID: 18789182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two forms of intergroup discrimination with positive and negative outcomes: explaining the positive-negative asymmetry effect.
    Gardham K; Brown R
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2001 Mar; 40(Pt 1):23-34. PubMed ID: 11329832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups.
    Duckitt J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 May; 32(5):684-96. PubMed ID: 16702160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects.
    Jetten J; Spears R; Manstead AS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Dec; 71(6):1222-33. PubMed ID: 8979388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceivers' responses to in-group and out-group members who blame a negative outcome on discrimination.
    Garcia DM; Reser AH; Amo RB; Redersdorff S; Branscombe NR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Jun; 31(6):769-80. PubMed ID: 15833904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The power of talk: developing discriminatory group norms through discussion.
    Smith LG; Postmes T
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2011 Jun; 50(Pt 2):193-215. PubMed ID: 21545454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When are we better than them and they worse than us? A closer look at social discrimination in positive and negative domains.
    Reynolds KJ; Turner JC; Haslam SA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Jan; 78(1):64-80. PubMed ID: 10653506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of information asymmetry and situational salience in reducing intergroup bias: the case of ultimatum games.
    Valenzuela A; Srivastava J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1671-83. PubMed ID: 22956295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Justice and discrimination between minimal groups: the limits of equity.
    Diehl M
    Br J Soc Psychol; 1989 Sep; 28 ( Pt 3)():227-38. PubMed ID: 2790416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The polarizing effects of group discussion in a negative normative context: Integrating societal-, group-, and individual-level factors.
    Koudenburg N; Greijdanus H; Scheepers D
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2019 Jan; 58(1):150-174. PubMed ID: 30246420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social identification structures the effects of perspective taking.
    Tarrant M; Calitri R; Weston D
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Sep; 23(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 22851441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Minority versus majority: intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm].
    Yoshida F; Kubota K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1994 Dec; 65(5):346-54. PubMed ID: 7884974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does personality explain in-group identification and discrimination? Evidence from the minimal group paradigm.
    Reynolds KJ; Turner JC; Haslam SA; Ryan MK; Bizumic B; Subasic E
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2007 Sep; 46(Pt 3):517-39. PubMed ID: 17877851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of personal and collective self-esteem on strategies of social differentiation.
    Long KM; Spears R; Manstead AS
    Br J Soc Psychol; 1994 Sep; 33 ( Pt 3)():313-29. PubMed ID: 7953220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptions of ambiguously unpleasant interracial interactions: a structural equation modeling approach.
    Marino TL; Negy C; Hammons ME; McKinney C; Asberg K
    J Psychol; 2007 Nov; 141(6):637-63. PubMed ID: 18044276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The social costs of extrinsic relative to intrinsic goal pursuits: their relation with social dominance and racial and ethnic prejudice.
    Duriez B; Vansteenkiste M; Soenens B; De Witte H
    J Pers; 2007 Aug; 75(4):757-82. PubMed ID: 17576358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.