These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16005790)

  • 1. Determinants of the demand for breast cancer screening among women veterans in the United States.
    Lairson DR; Chan W; Newmark GR
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Oct; 61(7):1608-17. PubMed ID: 16005790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey.
    Yabroff KR; Breen N; Vernon SW; Meissner HI; Freedman AN; Ballard-Barbash R
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 May; 13(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 15159302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized intervention to improve ongoing participation in mammography.
    Barr JK; Franks AL; Lee NC; Antonucci DM; Rifkind S; Schachter M
    Am J Manag Care; 2001 Sep; 7(9):887-94. PubMed ID: 11570022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved screening for breast cancer associated with a telephone-based risk assessment.
    Kadison P; Pelletier EM; Mounib EL; Oppedisano P; Poteat HT
    Prev Med; 1998; 27(3):493-501. PubMed ID: 9612841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Initial and repeat mammography screening in a low income multi-ethnic population in Los Angeles.
    Bastani R; Kaplan CP; Maxwell AE; Nisenbaum R; Pearce J; Marcus AC
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1995 Mar; 4(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 7742724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer screening, incidence, and mortality in West Virginia.
    Khanna R; Bhanegaonkar A; Colsher P; Madhavan SS; Halverson J
    W V Med J; 2009 Oct; 105 Spec No():24-32. PubMed ID: 19999262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Compliance with guidelines for mammography screening.
    Champion VL
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1992; 16(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 1458516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening mammography: a cross-sectional study to compare characteristics of women aged 40 and older from the deep South who are current, overdue, and never screeners.
    Lopez ED; Khoury AJ; Dailey AB; Hall AG; Chisholm LR
    Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):434-45. PubMed ID: 19879455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of mammography outreach in women veterans.
    Dalessandri KM; Cooper M; Rucker T
    West J Med; 1998 Sep; 169(3):150-2. PubMed ID: 9771153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physician and patient characteristics associated with outpatient breast cancer screening recommendations in the United States: analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data 1996-2004.
    Bhosle M; Samuel S; Vosuri V; Paskett E; Balkrishnan R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 May; 103(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 17028978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Financial barriers to mammography: who pays out-of-pocket?
    Makuc DM; Breen N; Meissner HI; Vernon SW; Cohen A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007 Apr; 16(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 17439380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can breast and cervical cancer screening visits be used to enhance colorectal cancer screening?
    Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Ellis J; Bernstein SJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):769-76. PubMed ID: 17411698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CAPRELA (Cancer Prevention for Latinas): findings of a pilot study in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County.
    Koval AE; Riganti AA; Foley KL
    N C Med J; 2006; 67(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16550986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are women with functional limitations at high risk of underutilization of mammography screening?
    Ahmed NU; Smith GL; Haber G; Belcon MC
    Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 19111790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer screening: recent trends in the use of mammography in Nebraska.
    Rettig B; Nelson N; Faulk R
    Nebr Med J; 1994 May; 79(5):136-8; discussion 139. PubMed ID: 8047188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health maintenance and screening in breast cancer survivors in the United States.
    Duffy CM; Clark MA; Allsworth JE
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 16455209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overuse of mammography during the first round of an organized breast cancer screening programme.
    Chamot E; Charvet A; Perneger TV
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Aug; 15(4):620-5. PubMed ID: 19522725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.
    Tang TS; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA; Duan L
    Psychooncology; 2009 Jul; 18(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 19035468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast cancer screening in women aged 80 and older: results from a national survey.
    Schonberg MA; McCarthy EP; Davis RB; Phillips RS; Hamel MB
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2004 Oct; 52(10):1688-95. PubMed ID: 15450046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.