These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16005801)

  • 1. Influence of margin design on the fit of high-precious alloy restorations in patients.
    Wöstmann B; Blösser T; Gouentenoudis M; Balkenhol M; Ferger P
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):611-8. PubMed ID: 16005801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
    J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins.
    Mitchell CA; Pintado MR; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):575-84. PubMed ID: 11404758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of the crown preparation margin and die type on the marginal accuracy of fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
    Ayad MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 18264520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of finish line design on marginal adaptation of electroformed metal-ceramic crowns.
    Shiratsuchi H; Komine F; Kakehashi Y; Matsumura H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 16543022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical acceptability of crown margins versus marginal gaps as determined by pre-doctoral students and prosthodontists.
    Bronson MR; Lindquist TJ; Dawson DV
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 16359478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling.
    Syrek A; Reich G; Ranftl D; Klein C; Cerny B; Brodesser J
    J Dent; 2010 Jul; 38(7):553-9. PubMed ID: 20381576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Precision of fit of two margin designs for metal-ceramic crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 17451481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system.
    Souza RO; Özcan M; Pavanelli CA; Buso L; Lombardo GH; Michida SM; Mesquita AM; Bottino MA
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Feb; 21(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 22050205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The significance of marginal gap and overextension measurement in the evaluation of the fit of complete crowns.
    Boeckler AF; Stadler A; Setz JM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov; 6(4):26-37. PubMed ID: 16299604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical parameters influencing the accuracy of 1- and 2-stage impressions: a randomized controlled trial.
    Luthardt RG; Walter MH; Weber A; Koch R; Rudolph H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 18717091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the marginal fit of Procera AllCeram crowns with two finish lines.
    Suárez MJ; González de Villaumbrosia P; Pradíes G; Lozano JF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 12854783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system.
    Tinschert J; Natt G; Mautsch W; Spiekermann H; Anusavice KJ
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 11504436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Kee E; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of recasting palladium-silver alloy on the fit of crowns with different marginal configurations.
    Lopes MB; Consani S; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):430-4. PubMed ID: 16275302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of sensitivity and specificity of clinical evaluation of cast restoration marginal accuracy compared to stereomicroscopy.
    Jahangiri L; Wahlers C; Hittelman E; Matheson P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 15674223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.