BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16005801)

  • 1. Influence of margin design on the fit of high-precious alloy restorations in patients.
    Wöstmann B; Blösser T; Gouentenoudis M; Balkenhol M; Ferger P
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):611-8. PubMed ID: 16005801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
    J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins.
    Mitchell CA; Pintado MR; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):575-84. PubMed ID: 11404758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of the crown preparation margin and die type on the marginal accuracy of fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
    Ayad MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 18264520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of finish line design on marginal adaptation of electroformed metal-ceramic crowns.
    Shiratsuchi H; Komine F; Kakehashi Y; Matsumura H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 16543022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical acceptability of crown margins versus marginal gaps as determined by pre-doctoral students and prosthodontists.
    Bronson MR; Lindquist TJ; Dawson DV
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 16359478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling.
    Syrek A; Reich G; Ranftl D; Klein C; Cerny B; Brodesser J
    J Dent; 2010 Jul; 38(7):553-9. PubMed ID: 20381576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Precision of fit of two margin designs for metal-ceramic crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 17451481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system.
    Souza RO; Özcan M; Pavanelli CA; Buso L; Lombardo GH; Michida SM; Mesquita AM; Bottino MA
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Feb; 21(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 22050205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The significance of marginal gap and overextension measurement in the evaluation of the fit of complete crowns.
    Boeckler AF; Stadler A; Setz JM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov; 6(4):26-37. PubMed ID: 16299604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical parameters influencing the accuracy of 1- and 2-stage impressions: a randomized controlled trial.
    Luthardt RG; Walter MH; Weber A; Koch R; Rudolph H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 18717091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the marginal fit of Procera AllCeram crowns with two finish lines.
    Suárez MJ; González de Villaumbrosia P; Pradíes G; Lozano JF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 12854783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system.
    Tinschert J; Natt G; Mautsch W; Spiekermann H; Anusavice KJ
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 11504436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Kee E; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of recasting palladium-silver alloy on the fit of crowns with different marginal configurations.
    Lopes MB; Consani S; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):430-4. PubMed ID: 16275302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of sensitivity and specificity of clinical evaluation of cast restoration marginal accuracy compared to stereomicroscopy.
    Jahangiri L; Wahlers C; Hittelman E; Matheson P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 15674223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.