315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16006931)
61. Vasoepididymostomy to the head of the epididymis: a comparative study of two microsurgical techniques in the rabbit.
Vancaillie T; Gordts S; Boeckx W; Vasquez G; Brosens I
Acta Eur Fertil; 1984; 15(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 6730862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Robotic assisted versus pure microsurgical vasectomy reversal: technique and prospective database control trial.
Parekattil SJ; Gudeloglu A; Brahmbhatt J; Wharton J; Priola KB
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2012 Sep; 28(7):435-44. PubMed ID: 22744901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Use of viscoelastic solution to improve visualization during urologic microsurgery: evaluation of patency after vasovasostomy.
Eisenberg ML; Walsh TJ; Turek PJ
Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):134-6. PubMed ID: 18977020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Microsurgical varicocelectomy for isolated asthenospermia.
Boman JM; Libman J; Zini A
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2129-32. PubMed ID: 18804226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Validation of a vasoepididymostomy predictor model: is vasoepididymostomy truly predictable preoperatively?
Kavoussi PK; Bird ET
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jul; 92(1):180-1. PubMed ID: 18835603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Patency following vasectomy reversal. Temporal and immunological considerations.
Amarin ZO; Obeidat BR
Saudi Med J; 2005 Aug; 26(8):1208-11. PubMed ID: 16127514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Superior outcomes of microsurgical vasectomy reversal in men with the same female partners.
Chan PT; Goldstein M
Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1371-4. PubMed ID: 15136104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Secondary azoospermia after vasovasostomy.
Kolettis PN; Fretz P; Burns JR; D'amico AM; Box LC; Sandlow JI
Urology; 2005 May; 65(5):968-71. PubMed ID: 15882733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Surgical outcome of microscopic vasectomy reversal: an analysis of 30 cases.
Yamamoto M; Hibi H; Yokoi K; Mishima A; Katsuno S
Nagoya J Med Sci; 1997 Mar; 60(1-2):37-42. PubMed ID: 9212647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Varicocelectomy for male infertility: a comparative study of open, laparoscopic and microsurgical approaches.
Al-Said S; Al-Naimi A; Al-Ansari A; Younis N; Shamsodini A; A-sadiq K; Shokeir AA
J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):266-70. PubMed ID: 18499176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. The relationship between intravasal sperm quality and patency rates after vasovasostomy.
Sigman M
J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):307-9. PubMed ID: 14665901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy with sperm cryopreservation for future assisted reproduction.
Hibi H; Yamada Y; Honda N; Fukatsu H; Katsuno S; Ohshima S; Yamamoto M
Int J Urol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):435-9. PubMed ID: 11168681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Techniques for vasectomy reversal.
Lipshultz LI; Rumohr JA; Bennett RC
Urol Clin North Am; 2009 Aug; 36(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 19643239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. End-to-end versus end-to-side proximal anastomosis in aortobifemoral bypass surgery: does it matter?
Ameli FM; Stein M; Aro L; Provan JL; Gray R; Grosman H
Can J Surg; 1991 Jun; 34(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 2054757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Vasovasostomy in the convoluted vas deferens: indications and outcomes.
Sandlow JI; Kolettis PN
J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):540-2. PubMed ID: 15643242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Partial obstruction, not antisperm antibodies, causing infertility after vasovasostomy.
Carbone DJ; Shah A; Thomas AJ; Agarwal A
J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):827-30. PubMed ID: 9474160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Feasibility of microsurgical reconstruction of the male reproductive tract after percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA).
Chan PT; Libman J
Can J Urol; 2003 Dec; 10(6):2070-3. PubMed ID: 14704113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Triangulation end-to-side vasoepididymostomy.
Berger RE
J Urol; 1998 Jun; 159(6):1951-3. PubMed ID: 9598495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Beneficial effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy is superior for men with bilateral versus unilateral repair.
Libman J; Jarvi K; Lo K; Zini A
J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2602-5; discussion 2605. PubMed ID: 17085170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Factors and practice patterns that affect the decision for vasoepididymostomy.
Ostrowski KA; Tadros NN; Polackwich AS; McClure RD; Fuchs EF; Hedges JC
Can J Urol; 2017 Feb; 24(1):8651-8655. PubMed ID: 28263131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
