BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16007569)

  • 41. Secondary analysis of case-control data.
    Jiang Y; Scott AJ; Wild CJ
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(8):1323-39. PubMed ID: 16220494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An evaluation of some methods for fitting dose-response models to quantal-response developmental toxicology data.
    Carr GJ; Portier CJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):779-91. PubMed ID: 8241373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A stochastic regression model for general trend analysis of longitudinal continuous data.
    Chao WH; Chen SH
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):571-87. PubMed ID: 19655314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. On the use of concordant pairs in matched case-control studies.
    Liang KY; Zeger SL
    Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1145-56. PubMed ID: 3233251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Coverage-adjusted entropy estimation.
    Vu VQ; Yu B; Kass RE
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):4039-60. PubMed ID: 17567838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On the use of the quasi-likelihood method in teratological experiments.
    Liang KY; Hanfelt J
    Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):872-80. PubMed ID: 7981409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A restricted maximum likelihood estimator for truncated height samples.
    A'Hearn B
    Econ Hum Biol; 2004 Mar; 2(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 15463990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Efficient parameter estimation in longitudinal data analysis using a hybrid GEE method.
    Leung DH; Wang YG; Zhu M
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jul; 10(3):436-45. PubMed ID: 19346528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Maximum likelihood estimation of ordered multinomial parameters.
    Jewell NP; Kalbfleisch JD
    Biostatistics; 2004 Apr; 5(2):291-306. PubMed ID: 15054032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Methods for estimating the parameters of a linear model for ordered categorical data.
    Lipsitz SR
    Biometrics; 1992 Mar; 48(1):271-81. PubMed ID: 1581487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An evaluation of statistical approaches for analyzing physician-randomized quality improvement interventions.
    Stedman MR; Gagnon DR; Lew RA; Solomon DH; Brookhart MA
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 18571476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Finite sample properties of maximum likelihood estimates of the recombination fraction in double backcross matings in man.
    Bolling DR; Murphy EA
    Am J Med Genet; 1979; 3(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 474622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The maximally exposed individual--comparison of maximum likelihood estimation of high quantiles to an extreme value estimate.
    Wilson MD; McCormick WP; Hinton TG
    Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1143-51. PubMed ID: 15563284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Confidence interval estimation of the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary outcome data.
    Zou G; Donner A
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):807-11. PubMed ID: 15339305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Statistics of the log-det estimator.
    Massingham T; Goldman N
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):2277-85. PubMed ID: 17703055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood.
    Kenward MG; Roger JH
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):983-97. PubMed ID: 9333350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Using historical controls in the analysis of developmental toxicity data.
    Ryan L
    Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):1126-35. PubMed ID: 8117906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
    Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reducing the effects of lead-time bias, length bias and over-detection in evaluating screening mammography: a censored bivariate data approach.
    Mahnken JD; Chan W; Freeman DH; Freeman JL
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):643-63. PubMed ID: 18445697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A stabilized moment estimator for the beta-binomial distribution.
    Tamura RN; Young SS
    Biometrics; 1987 Dec; 43(4):813-24. PubMed ID: 3427166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.