These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16007849)
1. Influence of the air-water interface on hydrosol lidar operation. Kokhanenko GP; Krekova MM; Penner LE; Shamanaev VS Appl Opt; 2005 Jun; 44(17):3510-9. PubMed ID: 16007849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensing the profile of particulate beam attenuation coefficient through a single-photon oceanic Raman lidar. Shangguan M; Liao Z; Guo Y; Lee Z Opt Express; 2023 Jul; 31(16):25398-25414. PubMed ID: 37710428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laser sensing of a subsurface oceanic layer. I. Effect of the atmosphere and wind-driven sea waves. Krekov GM; Krekova MM; Shamanaev VS Appl Opt; 1998 Mar; 37(9):1589-95. PubMed ID: 18268752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simultaneous sensing profiles of beam attenuation coefficient and volume scattering function at 180° using a single-photon underwater elastic-Raman lidar. Shangguan M; Liao Z; Guo Y Opt Express; 2024 Feb; 32(5):8189-8204. PubMed ID: 38439482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Airborne polarized lidar detection of scattering layers in the ocean. Vasilkov AP; Goldin YA; Gureev BA; Hoge FE; Swift RN; Wright CW Appl Opt; 2001 Aug; 40(24):4353-64. PubMed ID: 18360476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interpretation of airborne oceanic lidar: effects of multiple scattering. Gordon HR Appl Opt; 1982 Aug; 21(16):2996-3001. PubMed ID: 20396163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between the effective attenuation coefficient of spaceborne lidar signal and the IOPs of seawater. Liu Q; Liu D; Bai J; Zhang Y; Zhou Y; Xu P; Liu Z; Chen S; Che H; Wu L; Shen Y; Liu C Opt Express; 2018 Nov; 26(23):30278-30291. PubMed ID: 30469903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Information content of data measured with a multiple-field-of-view lidar. Veselovskii I; Korenskii M; Griaznov V; Whiteman DN; McGill M; Roy G; Bissonnette L Appl Opt; 2006 Sep; 45(26):6839-48. PubMed ID: 16926920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lidar returns from multiply scattering media in multiple-field-of-view and CCD lidars with polarization devices: comparison of semi-analytical solution and Monte Carlo data. Chaikovskaya LI; Zege EP; Katsev IL; Hirschberger M; Oppel UG Appl Opt; 2009 Jan; 48(3):623-32. PubMed ID: 19151834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Water Cloud Detection with Circular Polarization Lidar: A Semianalytic Monte Carlo Simulation Approach. Ahmad W; Zhang K; Tong Y; Xiao D; Wu L; Liu D Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polarimetric multiple scattering LiDAR model based on Poisson distribution. Roy G; Tremblay G Appl Opt; 2022 Jun; 61(18):5507-5516. PubMed ID: 36256120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Numerical evaluation of the possibilities of remote laser sensing of fish schools. Krekova MM; Krekov GM; Samokhvalov IV; Shamanaev VS Appl Opt; 1994 Aug; 33(24):5715-20. PubMed ID: 20935973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Full-day profiling of a beam attenuation coefficient using a single-photon underwater lidar with a large dynamic measurement range. Shangguan M; Yang Z; Lin Z; Weng Z; Sun J Opt Lett; 2024 Feb; 49(3):626-629. PubMed ID: 38300075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of satellite-retrieved oceanic inherent optical properties: proposed two-color elastic backscatter lidar and retrieval theory. Hoge FE Appl Opt; 2003 Dec; 42(36):7197-201. PubMed ID: 14717299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Algorithms for determining the spectral-energy characteristics of a random field of internal waves from fluctuations of lidar echo signals. Dolin LS; Dolina IS Appl Opt; 2020 Apr; 59(10):C78-C86. PubMed ID: 32400568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simple relation between lidar multiple scattering and depolarization for water clouds. Hu Y; Liu Z; Winker D; Vaughan M; Noel V; Bissonnette L; Roy G; McGill M Opt Lett; 2006 Jun; 31(12):1809-11. PubMed ID: 16729078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simulation of sea surface wave influence on small target detection with airborne laser depth sounding. Tulldahl HM; Steinvall KO Appl Opt; 2004 Apr; 43(12):2462-83. PubMed ID: 15119617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laser Sensing of a Subsurface Oceanic Layer. II. Polarization Characteristics of Signals. Krekov GM; Krekova MM; Shamanaev VS Appl Opt; 1998 Mar; 37(9):1596-601. PubMed ID: 18268753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Iterative retrieval method for ocean attenuation profiles measured by airborne lidar. Liu H; Chen P; Mao Z; Pan D Appl Opt; 2020 Apr; 59(10):C42-C51. PubMed ID: 32400564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]