388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16008297)
1. Stem cells: East...and West. Country report: United Kingdom.
Cookson C
Sci Am; 2005 Jul; 293(1):A23. PubMed ID: 16008297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The bioethics agenda and the Bush second term.
Cohen E
New Atlantis; 2004 Fall-2005 Winter; 7():11-8. PubMed ID: 15812948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A pathwork of laws. Little consensus exists from country to country about what practices should be allowed, despite several attempts to find agreement.
Gardner R; Watson T
Sci Am; 2005 Jul; 293(1):A16-21. PubMed ID: 16008295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bankrolling stem-cell research with California dollars.
Yamamoto KR
N Engl J Med; 2004 Oct; 351(17):1711-3. PubMed ID: 15496617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stem-cell politics.
Okie S
N Engl J Med; 2006 Oct; 355(16):1633-7. PubMed ID: 17050884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cloning and stem cells--handicapping the political and scientific debates.
Daley GQ
N Engl J Med; 2003 Jul; 349(3):211-2. PubMed ID: 12867604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Embryo cell research divides public, Senate.
Christ Century; 2002 Apr 24-May 1; 119(9):10-1. PubMed ID: 12705264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Lethal experimentation on human beings: Roe's effect on bioethics.
Saunders WL
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):817-30. PubMed ID: 16700125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Altered embryos offered as solution to stem-cell rift.
Check E
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7049):309. PubMed ID: 16034380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. President's Council on Bioethics: reproduction and responsibility.
Doerflinger RM
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(3):461-9. PubMed ID: 15452926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Washington Insider: Congressional impasse on human cloning.
Doerflinger RM
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15192847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Everybody must get cloned: ideological objections do not hold up.
Triggle DJ
Free Inq; 2002-2003 Winter; 23(1):32-3. PubMed ID: 16208834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Promoting life?: Embryonic stem cell research legislation.
Miller JF
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2003; 52(2):437-79. PubMed ID: 15214335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The business of stem cells.
Spar D
N Engl J Med; 2004 Jul; 351(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 15254279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Washington insider: federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
Doerflinger RM
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 16425497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In cloning debate, a compromise.
Lamb GM
Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2004 Apr; ():14, 16. PubMed ID: 15457614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The California gambit. The Golden State has launched a 3bn dollar wager on stem cell science.
Gibbs WW
Sci Am; 2005 Jul; 293(1):A24-7. PubMed ID: 16008298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Dipping into Uncle Sam's pockets: federal funding of stem cell research: is it legal?
Goldstein C
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 2002; 11(2-3):229-59. PubMed ID: 15212067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Stem cell research and conditional federal funding: do state laws allowing more extensive research pose a problem for federalism?
Schiller C
Pepperdine Law Rev; 2004 May; 31(4):1017-54. PubMed ID: 16514766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Politics, prohibitions and the lost public perspective: a comment on Bill C-56: the Assisted Human Reproduction Act.
Caulfield T
Alta Law Rev; 2002 Sep; 40(2):451-63. PubMed ID: 16211737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]