These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16009640)

  • 41. Vaginal vs. cesarean delivery for preterm breech presentation of singleton infants in California: a population-based study.
    Robilio PA; Boe NM; Danielsen B; Gilbert WM
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Jun; 52(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 17694963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of midforceps, low-forceps, and spontaneous vaginal deliveries.
    Tedesco JH
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1989 Apr; 89(4):461-4. PubMed ID: 2737931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Outcome in obstetric care related to oxytocin use. A population-based study.
    Oscarsson ME; Amer-Wåhlin I; Rydhstroem H; Källén K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(9):1094-8. PubMed ID: 16929414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
    Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Early preterm breech delivery: is a policy of planned vaginal delivery associated with increased risk of neonatal death?
    Kayem G; Baumann R; Goffinet F; El Abiad S; Ville Y; Cabrol D; Haddad B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 198(3):289.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18241827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Computed tomographic pelvimetry.
    Lenke RR; Shuman WP
    J Reprod Med; 1986 Oct; 31(10):958-60. PubMed ID: 3783538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Evaluation of decisional elements of vaginal delivery in case of breech presentation in 19 university hospitals in France].
    Michel S; Drain A; Closset E; Deruelle P; Subtil D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Sep; 38(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 19539434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?
    Kazandjian VA; Chaulk CP; Ogunbo S; Wicker K
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Feb; 13(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 17286718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Outcome of induced deliveries in growth-restricted fetuses: second thoughts about the vaginal option.
    Maslovitz S; Shenhav M; Levin I; Almog B; Ochshorn Y; Kupferminc M; Many A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Feb; 279(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 18506461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Fetal macrosomia greater than or equal to 4000 grams. Comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes in diabetic and nondiabetic women.
    Saleh A; Al-Sultan SM; Moria AM; Rakaf FI; Turkistani YM; Al-Onazi SH
    Saudi Med J; 2008 Oct; 29(10):1463-9. PubMed ID: 18946574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Influence of mode of delivery in term breech presentation on the Apgar score and transfer in neonatal care unit. Results of the management of 568 singleton pregnancies in a level III French maternity].
    Delotte J; Trastour C; Bafghi A; Boucoiran I; D'Angelo L; Bongain A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Apr; 37(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 18023999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Dillema about the method of delivery for the fetus in breech presentation].
    Vasilj O; Matijević R; Grgić O
    Acta Med Croatica; 2007 Apr; 61(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 17585474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Trial of vaginal breech delivery: current role.
    Yamamura Y; Ramin KD; Ramin SM
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 50(2):526-36. PubMed ID: 17513938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Asymmetric pelvis and term breech presentation: is planned vaginal delivery still a safe option?
    Lallemant M; Ceri T; Offringa Y; Aubry S; Bourtembourg A; Riethmuller D; Ramanah R; Guerby P; Mottet N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Oct; 304(4):919-927. PubMed ID: 33791843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Term breech delivery: does X-ray pelvimetry help?
    Biswas A; Johnstone MJ
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 May; 33(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 8216113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term.
    Allen VM; O'Connell CM; Baskett TF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 16880297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The significance of peripartum fever in women undergoing vaginal deliveries.
    Bensal A; Weintraub AY; Levy A; Holcberg G; Sheiner E
    Am J Perinatol; 2008 Oct; 25(9):567-72. PubMed ID: 18756433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Maternal mean corpuscle volume and oxytocin augmentation during vaginal delivery.
    Lurie S; Yarden E; Ben-Aroya Z; Sadan O; Glezerman M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Sep; 272(3):232-4. PubMed ID: 15838695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Interventions during labor for reducing instrumental deliveries].
    Schmitz T; Meunier E
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Dec; 37 Suppl 8():S179-87. PubMed ID: 19268195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: A retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001.
    Cheng YW; Shaffer BL; Caughey AB
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Sep; 19(9):563-8. PubMed ID: 16966125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.