114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1600983)
1. The effect of atrio-ventricular delay programming in patients with DDDR pacemakers.
Sulke AN; Chambers JB; Sowton E
Eur Heart J; 1992 Apr; 13(4):464-72. PubMed ID: 1600983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes.
Sulke N; Chambers J; Dritsas A; Sowton E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Mar; 17(3):696-706. PubMed ID: 1993790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is accurate rate response programming necessary?
Sulke N; Dritsas A; Chambers J; Sowton E
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Aug; 13(8):1031-44. PubMed ID: 1697950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Haemodynamic benefit of a rate-adapted A-V delay in dual chamber pacing.
Ritter P; Daubert C; Mabo P; Descaves C; Gouffault J
Eur Heart J; 1989 Jul; 10(7):637-46. PubMed ID: 2767075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.
Schwaab B; Kindermann M; Schätzer-Klotz D; Berg M; Franow H; Fröhlig G; Schieffer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Nov; 24(11):1585-95. PubMed ID: 11816626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing the AV delay in DDD pacemaker patients with high degree AV block: mitral valve Doppler versus impedance cardiography.
Kindermann M; Fröhlig G; Doerr T; Schieffer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Oct; 20(10 Pt 1):2453-62. PubMed ID: 9358487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction through programming a long atrioventricular delay along with the DDIR mode.
Nitardy A; Langreck H; Dietz R; Stockburger M
Clin Res Cardiol; 2009 Jan; 98(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18853096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A perspective on atrioventricular delay optimization in patients with a dual chamber pacemaker.
Cristina Porciani M; Fantini F; Musilli N; Sabini A; Michelucci A; Colella A; Pieragnoli P; Demarchi G; Padeletti L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Mar; 27(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 15009859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The effect of changes in stroke volume on QT dispersion during long-term DDD and VVI pacing].
Lelakowski J; Majewski J; Bednarek J; Szczepkowski J; Machejek J
Przegl Lek; 2001; 58(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11475854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation.
Höijer CJ; Brandt J; Willenheimer R; Juul-Möller S; Boström PA
Eur Heart J; 2002 Mar; 23(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 11863352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of dual-chamber pacing with short atrioventricular delay in dilated cardiomyopathy.
Brecker SJ; Xiao HB; Sparrow J; Gibson DG
Lancet; 1992 Nov; 340(8831):1308-12. PubMed ID: 1360034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rate-dependent AV delay optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Scharf C; Li P; Muntwyler J; Chugh A; Oral H; Pelosi F; Morady F; Armstrong WF
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Apr; 28(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 15826259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pacemaker hemodynamics: clinical implications.
Buckingham TA; Janosik DL; Pearson AC
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 1992; 34(5):347-66. PubMed ID: 1542730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Determination of the optimal atrioventricular timing by impedance plethysmography in patients with cardiac pacing; correlations with left ventricular filling].
Rey JL; Deschamps-Berger PH; Tribouilloy C; Hermida JS; Kugener H; Jarry G; Marek A
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1994 Jun; 87(6):737-44. PubMed ID: 7702416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ventricular performance in relation to heart rate and AV delay at rest.
Göhl K; Perl S; Wortmann A; Bachmann K
Eur Heart J; 1992 Nov; 13 Suppl E():91-8. PubMed ID: 1478217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "Subclinical" pacemaker syndrome: a randomised study of symptom free patients with ventricular demand (VVI) pacemakers upgraded to dual chamber devices.
Sulke N; Dritsas A; Bostock J; Wells A; Morris R; Sowton E
Br Heart J; 1992 Jan; 67(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 1739528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal atrioventricular delay at rest and during exercise in patients with dual chamber pacemakers: a non-invasive assessment by continuous wave Doppler.
Mehta D; Gilmour S; Ward DE; Camm AJ
Br Heart J; 1989 Feb; 61(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 2923753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sympathetic nervous system response to dynamic exercise in complete AV block patients treated with AV synchronous pacing with fixed AV delay or with auto-AV delay.
Igawa O; Tomokuni A; Saitoh M; Kitamura H; Miyakoda H; Kotake H; Mashiba H; Itoh S; Kurogane H; Yoshida Y
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1766-72. PubMed ID: 1704538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
