223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16010040)
1. Analysis of the effects of different materials in a tooth implant-supported fixed prosthesis using finite element method.
Dargahi J; Najarian S; Talebi M
Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(4):317-31. PubMed ID: 16010040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials.
Ciftçi Y; Canay S
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 12066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
Sertgöz A
Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9484066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of a thin HA coating on the stress/strain distribution in bone around dental implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Aoki H; Ozeki K; Ohtani Y; Fukui Y; Asaoka T
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 16518015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Structure and mechanical properties of Cresco-Ti laser-welded joints and stress analyses using finite element models of fixed distal extension and fixed partial prosthetic designs.
Uysal H; Kurtoglu C; Gurbuz R; Tutuncu N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 15775924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of superstructure materials and misfit on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: a finite element analysis.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Delben JA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 20485030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of framework shape on the fracture strength of implant-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in the molar region.
Tsumita M; Kokubo Y; Vult von Steyern P; Fukushima S
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):274-85. PubMed ID: 18205740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of cusp inclination on stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses. A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Falcón-Antenucci RM; Pellizzer EP; de Carvalho PS; Goiato MC; Noritomi PY
J Prosthodont; 2010 Jul; 19(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 20345742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bivariate evaluation of cylinder implant diameter and length: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kong L; Sun Y; Hu K; Li D; Hou R; Yang J; Liu B
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 18205741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of stress induced in peri-implant bone tissue by misfit in multi-implant prosthesis.
Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
Dent Mater; 2006 Apr; 22(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 16198407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of different post design and composition on stress distribution in maxillary central incisor: Finite element analysis.
Silva NR; Castro CG; Santos-Filho PC; Silva GR; Campos RE; Soares PV; Soares CJ
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19553714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Geometric element analysis of fretting in a model of a modular femoral component of a hip implant.
Lewis G
Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 14757952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
