223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16010040)
21. Design of monolimb using finite element modelling and statistics-based Taguchi method.
Lee WC; Zhang M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):759-66. PubMed ID: 15963612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of abutment's height and framework alloy on the load distribution of mandibular cantilevered implant-supported prosthesis.
Suedam V; Souza EA; Moura MS; Jacques LB; Rubo JH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 19191796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Stress analysis of effects of nonrigid connectors on fixed partial dentures with pier abutments.
Oruc S; Eraslan O; Tukay HA; Atay A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 18319089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Micromotion and stress distribution of immediate loaded implants: a finite element analysis.
Fazel A; Aalai S; Rismanchian M; Sadr-Eshkevari P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 18783413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical comparison of implant retained fixed partial dentures with fiber reinforced composite versus conventional metal frameworks: a 3D FEA study.
Erkmen E; Meriç G; Kurt A; Tunç Y; Eser A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Jan; 4(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 21094484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of cantilever length and framework alloy on the stress distribution of mandibular-cantilevered implant-supported prostheses.
Jacques LB; Moura MS; Suedam V; Souza EA; Rubo JH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):737-41. PubMed ID: 19489929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Loading of bone surrounding implants through three-unit fixed partial denture fixation: a finite-element analysis based on in vitro and in vivo strain measurements.
Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16672032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Chang CH; Hsu JT; Fallgatter AM; Ko CC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):551-62. PubMed ID: 17929515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Finite element stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries.
Cruz M; Lourenço AF; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; de Castro Lemonge AC; Wassall T
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):421-38. PubMed ID: 17065763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of superstructure design on stress distribution in peri-implant bone during mandibular flexure.
Nokar S; Baghai Naini R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 20209184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations.
Ciftçi Y; Canay S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):571-82. PubMed ID: 10960992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Finite element analysis of a model of a therapeutic shoe: effect of material selection for the outsole.
Lewis G
Biomed Mater Eng; 2003; 13(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 12652024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mechanical interactions of an implant/tooth-supported system under different periodontal supports and number of splinted teeth with rigid and non-rigid connections.
Lin CL; Chang SH; Wang JC; Chang WJ
J Dent; 2006 Oct; 34(9):682-91. PubMed ID: 16439048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Design optimization of functionally graded dental implant.
Hedia HS; Mahmoud NA
Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 15156104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mechanical response of bone under short-term loading of a dental implant with an internal layer simulating the nonlinear behaviour of the periodontal ligament.
Genna F; Paganelli C; Salgarello S; Sapelli P
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003; 6(5-6):305-18. PubMed ID: 14675951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
