These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1034 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16011234)

  • 21. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
    Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
    Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 10709042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of disinfection with peracetic acid and hypochlorite in dimensional alterations of casts obtained from addition silicone and polyether impressions.
    Queiroz DA; Peçanha MM; Neves AC; Frizzera F; Tonetto MR; Silva-Concílio LR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1100-5. PubMed ID: 24858758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of one- and two-step techniques with the use of putty/wash addition silicone impression materials.
    Idris B; Houston F; Claffey N
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 8809262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy die material using different polymerization methods.
    Prisco R; Cozzolino G; Vigolo P
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 19054302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hydraulic implant abutment level impressions.
    Hoos JC; Kaplowitz GJ
    Tex Dent J; 2003 Sep; 120(9):888-9. PubMed ID: 14560463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The wetting of surface-treated silicone impression materials by gypsum mixes containing disinfectants and modifiers.
    Abdelaziz KM; Combe EC; Hodges JS
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16011621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
    Rahme HY; Adib SM; Zebouni EA; Bechara BB; Rifai KT
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of the Association Between the Tray and Impression Techniques on Angulated Implants Using the All-on-Four System.
    de Avila ED; Castanharo SM; Casalle N; Vasconcelos JA; de Assis Mollo F
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():382-5. PubMed ID: 24641165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
    Dubal RK; Friel T; Taylor PD
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments.
    Eliasson A; Ortorp A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e30-8. PubMed ID: 21453396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Over-refractory casting technique as an alternative to one-piece multi-unit fixed partial denture frameworks.
    de Oliveira Correa G; Henriques GE; Mesquita MF; Sobrinho LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16543023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.