328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16011778)
1. Anatomic Endodontic Technology (AET)--a crown-down root canal preparation technique: basic concepts, operative procedure and instruments.
Riitano F
Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):575-87. PubMed ID: 16011778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The effect of instrumentation on original apical foramen shape using steel vs niti rotatory: computerized analysis].
Gallina G; Cumbo E; Gallo P; Pizzo G; D'Angelo M
Minerva Stomatol; 2002; 51(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 11845115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-sectional analysis of root canals prepared with NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel reciprocating files.
Grande NM; Plotino G; Butti A; Messina F; Pameijer CH; Somma F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jan; 103(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 17178505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
Schäfer E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The LightSpeed system.
Barbakow F
Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Jan; 48(1):113-35. PubMed ID: 15066510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Root canal preparation with Endo-Eze AET: changes in root canal shape assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Paqué F; Barbakow F; Peters OA
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):456-64. PubMed ID: 15946266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel technique for the removal of fractured instruments in the apical third of curved root canals.
Rahimi M; Parashos P
Int Endod J; 2009 Mar; 42(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 19228217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Potential relationship between design of nickel-titanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture.
Kim HC; Lee MH; Yum J; Versluis A; Lee CJ; Kim BM
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1195-9. PubMed ID: 20630298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical root canal preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety. Status report for the American Journal of Dentistry.
Bergmans L; Van Cleynenbreugel J; Wevers M; Lambrechts P
Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):324-33. PubMed ID: 11803999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of root canal curvatures before and after canal preparation (part II): A method based on numeric calculus.
Sonntag D; Stachniss-Carp S; Stachniss C; Stachniss V
Aust Endod J; 2006 Apr; 32(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 16603041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of curved canal instrumentation using nickel-titanium or stainless steel files with the balanced-force technique.
Harlan AL; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 8941749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.
Short JA; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC
J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):503-7. PubMed ID: 9587320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of root canal preparation using Flex Master Ni-Ti and Endo-Eze AET stainless steel instruments.
Nordmeyer S; Schnell V; Hülsmann M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 21167758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Apical transportation: a comparative evaluation of three root canal instrumentation techniques with three different apical diameters.
López FU; Fachin EV; Camargo Fontanella VR; Barletta FB; Só MV; Grecca FS
J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1545-8. PubMed ID: 19026892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
