These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1601192)

  • 1. Noise reduction hearing aids: release from masking and release from distortion.
    Van Tasell DJ; Crain TR
    Ear Hear; 1992 Apr; 13(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 1601192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce 'upward spread' of masking?
    Fabry DA; Leek MR; Walden BE; Cord M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 8126656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Rankovic CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise.
    Gustafsson HA; Arlinger SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):518-29. PubMed ID: 8120263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aided growth of masking for speech and nonspeech signals.
    Fortune T
    Ear Hear; 1999 Jun; 20(3):214-27. PubMed ID: 10386848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of frequency-selective attenuation on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in conditions of low-frequency noise.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):885-94. PubMed ID: 1939893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Potential benefits of adaptive frequency-gain characteristics for speech reception in noise.
    Rankovic CM; Freyman RL; Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):354-62. PubMed ID: 1737884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of an articulation-index based model for predicting the effects of adaptive frequency response hearing aids.
    Fabry DA; Van Tasell DJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 33(4):676-89. PubMed ID: 2273883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of low-frequency gain reduction on speech recognition and its relation to upward spread of masking.
    Cook JA; Bacon SP; Sammeth CA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Apr; 40(2):410-22. PubMed ID: 9130209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spread of masking in normal subjects and in subjects with high-frequency hearing loss.
    Trees DE; Turner CW
    Audiology; 1986; 25(2):70-83. PubMed ID: 3707439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of varying the amplitude-frequency response on the masked speech-reception threshold of sentences for hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Aug; 86(2):621-8. PubMed ID: 2768675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of an adaptive filter hearing aid on speech recognition in noise by hearing-impaired subjects.
    van Tasell DJ; Larsen SY; Fabry DA
    Ear Hear; 1988 Feb; 9(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 3342940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Upward spread of masking in normal and abnormal ears].
    Picard M; Couture-Metz F
    Audiology; 1985; 24(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 3994593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.