These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1601196)

  • 1. Monaural versus binaural hearing: ease of listening, word recognition, and attentional effort.
    Feuerstein JF
    Ear Hear; 1992 Apr; 13(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 1601196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binaural intelligibility prediction based on the speech transmission index.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Drullman R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4514-23. PubMed ID: 18537400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech recognition abilities in noise for children with severe-to-profound unilateral hearing impairment.
    Ruscetta MN; Arjmand EM; Pratt SR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 69(6):771-9. PubMed ID: 15885329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monaural vs binaural speech reception threshold and word discrimination scores in the hearing impaired.
    Siegenthaler BM; Craig CH
    J Aud Res; 1981 Apr; 21(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 7052803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech discrimination in children: auditory and auditory/visual processing with binaural and monaural presentation.
    Yonovitz A; Dickenson P; Miller D; Spydell J
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):60-4. PubMed ID: 511664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binaural speech discrimination under noise in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kumar KV; Rao AB
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1988 Oct; 59(10):932-6. PubMed ID: 3190620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Word recognition performance in continuous and interrupted broad-band noise by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Stuart A; Phillips DP; Green WB
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):658-63. PubMed ID: 8588673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of asymmetrical signal degradation on binaural speech recognition in children and adults.
    Rothpletz AM; Tharpe AM; Grantham DW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):269-80. PubMed ID: 15157129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Speech discrimination with bilateral cochlear implants in noisy conditions].
    Au KK; Jin H; Hui Y; Wei L
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 36(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 12761958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Zeng FG; Liu S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech recognition in background noise: monaural versus binaural listening conditions in normal-hearing patients.
    Persson P; Harder H; Arlinger S; Magnuson B
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 Sep; 22(5):625-30. PubMed ID: 11568669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise.
    Anderson Gosselin P; Gagné JP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):944-58. PubMed ID: 21060138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of ear protectors on word discrimination in subject with normal hearing and subjects with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Chung DY; Gannon RP
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 511652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Evaluation of the World Health Organization and American Medical Association Ratings of Hearing Impairment and Simulated Single-Sided Deafness.
    Vermiglio AJ; Griffin S; Post C; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(7):634-647. PubMed ID: 29988011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition in patients after successful surgery for unilateral congenital ear anomalies.
    Snik FM; Teunissen B; Cremers WR
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Aug; 104(8 Pt 1):1029-34. PubMed ID: 8052068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory evoked potentials in the detection of interaural intensity differences in children and adults.
    Wambacq IJ; Koehnke J; Shea-Miller KJ; Besing J; Toth V; Abubakr A
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):320-31. PubMed ID: 17485981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech intelligibility in noise with ear protectors.
    Abel SM; Alberti PW; Riko K
    J Otolaryngol; 1980 Jun; 9(3):256-65. PubMed ID: 7001041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.