342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16012034)
1. Effect of peri-modiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve responses: a neural response telemetry study.
van Weert S; Stokroos RJ; Rikers MM; van Dijk P
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):725-31. PubMed ID: 16012034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural response thresholds in the Nucleus Contour cochlear implant before and after stylet removal.
Tsuji RK; Goffi-Gomez MV; Peralta CO; Guedes MC; Magalhães AT; Neto RB; Bento RF
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Nov; 129(11):1330-6. PubMed ID: 19863333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant].
Yang H; Tang J; Cao K; Zhu X; Wang Y; Pan T
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant.
Shallop JK; Facer GW; Peterson A
Laryngoscope; 1999 Nov; 109(11):1755-9. PubMed ID: 10569402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of neural response telemetry thresholds with behavioral T/C levels].
Chen X; Han D; Zhao X; Wang S; Kong Y; Liu S; Mo L; Liu B; Wu Y
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 37(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 12966804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neural response telemetry in cochlear implant users.
Kiss JG; Tóth F; Nagy AL; Jarabin J; Szamosközi A; Torkos A; Jóri J; Czigner J
Int Tinnitus J; 2003; 9(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 14763333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC
Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The current tendencies and prospects of the neural response telemetry in the rehabilitation of the patients after cochlear implantation].
Bakhshinian VV
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2014; (2):21-5. PubMed ID: 24781166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between NRT measurement and behavioural levels in patients with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant.
Di Nardo W; Ippolito S; Quaranta N; Cadoni G; Galli J
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Oct; 23(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 15108484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
