These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

575 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16012136)

  • 1. Opening Pandora's pillbox: using modern information tools to improve drug safety.
    Gottlieb S
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2005; 24(4):938-48. PubMed ID: 16012136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety in numbers--monitoring risk in approved drugs.
    Okie S
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Mar; 352(12):1173-6. PubMed ID: 15788493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FDA attempting to overcome major roadblocks in monitoring drug safety.
    Zielinski SL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jun; 97(12):872-3. PubMed ID: 15956645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Importance and challenges of studying marketed drugs: what is a phase IV study? Common clinical research designs, registries, and self-reporting systems.
    Glasser SP; Salas M; Delzell E
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Sep; 47(9):1074-86. PubMed ID: 17766697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulatory considerations for determining postmarketing study commitments.
    Meyer RJ
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Aug; 82(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 17538552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adverse drug event surveillance and drug withdrawals in the United States, 1969-2002: the importance of reporting suspected reactions.
    Wysowski DK; Swartz L
    Arch Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 165(12):1363-9. PubMed ID: 15983284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. U.S. postmarketing pharmacovigilance compliance in the midst of regulatory uncertainty.
    Goldman SA
    Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(3):513-28. PubMed ID: 17915393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. National adverse drug reaction reporting. 1984-1989.
    Faich GA
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 Aug; 151(8):1645-7. PubMed ID: 1872669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The FDA and drug safety: a proposal for sweeping changes.
    Furberg CD; Levin AA; Gross PA; Shapiro RS; Strom BL
    Arch Intern Med; 2006 Oct; 166(18):1938-42. PubMed ID: 17030825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Provision of information on regulatory authorities' websites.
    Vitry A; Lexchin J; Sasich L; Dupin-Spriet T; Reed T; Bertele V; Garattini S; Toop L; Hurley E
    Intern Med J; 2008 Jul; 38(7):559-67. PubMed ID: 18336542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Form for reporting serious adverse events and product problems with human drug and biological products and devices; availability--FDA. Notice.
    Fed Regist; 1993 Jun; 58(105):31596-614. PubMed ID: 10171452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety surveillance in drug development: understanding the process and its implications for nephrology nursing.
    Browar S
    Nephrol Nurs J; 2002 Apr; 29(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 11997949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-clinical Post-Marketing Commitments for newly licenced pharmaceuticals.
    Reeve LM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Nov; 55(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 19589365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of serious adverse drug reactions: a proactive pharmacovigilance program (RADAR) vs safety activities conducted by the Food and Drug Administration and pharmaceutical manufacturers.
    Bennett CL; Nebeker JR; Yarnold PR; Tigue CC; Dorr DA; McKoy JM; Edwards BJ; Hurdle JF; West DP; Lau DT; Angelotta C; Weitzman SA; Belknap SM; Djulbegovic B; Tallman MS; Kuzel TM; Benson AB; Evens A; Trifilio SM; Courtney DM; Raisch DW
    Arch Intern Med; 2007 May; 167(10):1041-9. PubMed ID: 17533207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adverse drug reactions in elderly patients: alternative approaches to postmarket surveillance.
    Noah BA; Brushwood DB
    J Health Law; 2000; 33(3):383-454. PubMed ID: 11184355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How do pharmaceutical companies handle consumer adverse drug reaction reports? An overview based on a survey of French drug safety managers and officers.
    Fleuranceau-Morel P
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2002; 11(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 11998550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Could conditional release of new drugs provide the information required to study drug effectiveness? - A discussion paper.
    Rawson NS; West R; Appel WC
    Can J Clin Pharmacol; 2000; 7(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 11118964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Drug safety. Gaps in the safety net.
    Couzin J
    Science; 2005 Jan; 307(5707):196-8. PubMed ID: 15653480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is having more preapproval data the best way to assure drug safety?
    Garber AM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(5):w371-3. PubMed ID: 18682442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current and future state of FDA-CMS parallel reviews.
    Messner DA; Tunis SR
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Mar; 91(3):383-5. PubMed ID: 22343814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.