122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16012518)
1. Impact of the introduction of organised screening for cervical cancer in Turin, Italy: cancer incidence by screening history 1992-98.
Ronco G; Pilutti S; Patriarca S; Montanari G; Ghiringhello B; Volante R; Giordano L; Zanetti R; Mancini E; Segnan N;
Br J Cancer; 2005 Aug; 93(3):376-8. PubMed ID: 16012518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interaction of spontaneous and organised screening for cervical cancer in Turin, Italy.
Ronco G; Segnan N; Giordano L; Pilutti S; Senore C; Ponti A; Volante R
Eur J Cancer; 1997 Jul; 33(8):1262-7. PubMed ID: 9301453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Organised vs. spontaneous Pap-smear screening for cervical cancer: A case-control study.
Nieminen P; Kallio M; Anttila A; Hakama M
Int J Cancer; 1999 Sep; 83(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 10449608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Organised cervical cancer screening still leads to higher coverage than spontaneous screening in The Netherlands.
Bos AB; van Ballegooijen M; van Gessel-Dabekaussen AA; Habbema JD
Eur J Cancer; 1998 Sep; 34(10):1598-601. PubMed ID: 9893635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Activity level and process indicators of organised programmes for cervical cancer screening in Italy.
Ronco G; Giubilato P; Naldoni C; Zorzi M; Anghinoni E; Scalisi A; Dalla Palma P; Zanier L; Federici A; Angeloni C; Prandini S; Maglietta R; Mancini E; Pizzuti R; Iossa A; Segnan N; Zappa M
Epidemiol Prev; 2006; 30(1 Suppl 3):27-40. PubMed ID: 16937844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines.
Nowakowski A; Cybulski M; Śliwczyński A; Chil A; Teter Z; Seroczyński P; Arbyn M; Anttila A
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():279. PubMed ID: 25879466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 'Organised' cervical screening 45 years on: How consistent are organised screening practices?
Williams JH; Carter SM; Rychetnik L
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(17):3029-38. PubMed ID: 25282406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the impact of an organised screening programme on cervical cancer incidence: A 26-year study from northern Italy.
Bucchi L; Baldacchini F; Mancini S; Ravaioli A; Giuliani O; Vattiato R; Falcini F; Giorgi Rossi P; Campari C; Canuti D; Di Felice E; Sassoli de Bianchi P; Ferretti S; Bertozzi N; Biggeri A;
Int J Cancer; 2019 Mar; 144(5):1017-1026. PubMed ID: 30120770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effective policies for cervical cancer screening. An international review.
Fahs MC; Plichta SB; Mandelblatt JS
Pharmacoeconomics; 1996 Mar; 9(3):211-30. PubMed ID: 10160098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Characterization of "non-attenders" in an organized screening against cancer of cervix uteri].
Larsen LP; Olesen F
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 May; 158(21):2987-91. PubMed ID: 8686037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical cancer screening in Italy.
Segnan N; Ronco G; Ciatto S
Eur J Cancer; 2000 Nov; 36(17):2235-9. PubMed ID: 11072211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Self-reported history of Pap-smear in HIV-positive women in Northern Italy: a cross-sectional study.
Dal Maso L; Franceschi S; Lise M; De' Bianchi PS; Polesel J; Ghinelli F; Falcini F; Finarelli AC;
BMC Cancer; 2010 Jun; 10():310. PubMed ID: 20565935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. Experiences after 25 years of voluntary screening and 2 years of organized screening].
Thoresen SO; Skare GB; Sandvin O
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Aug; 117(18):2613-5. PubMed ID: 9324815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Screening for cervical cancer in the county of Funen. Status of 25 years of development and experiences].
Hølund B; Grinsted P
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(22):2163-6. PubMed ID: 16768956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical cancer screening programme in Finland.
Anttila A; Nieminen P
Eur J Cancer; 2000 Nov; 36(17):2209-14. PubMed ID: 11072206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pattern of cervical screening utilization in Italy.
Ferraroni M; La Vecchia C; Pagano R; Negri E; Parazzini F; Decarli A
Tumori; 1989 Oct; 75(5):420-2. PubMed ID: 2603219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. A one-year registration of cervical cytological tests].
Bjørge T; Gunbjørud AB; Langmark F; Skare GB; Thoresen SO
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Jan; 114(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 8191435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of organised screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Finland, 1963-1995: recent increase in cervical cancer incidence.
Anttila A; Pukkala E; Söderman B; Kallio M; Nieminen P; Hakama M
Int J Cancer; 1999 Sep; 83(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 10449609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficiency of organised and opportunistic cytological screening for cancer in situ of the cervix.
Gustafsson L; Sparén P; Gustafsson M; Wilander E; Bergström R; Adami HO
Br J Cancer; 1995 Aug; 72(2):498-505. PubMed ID: 7640239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
