These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16012607)

  • 1. Summary of some results on an EEG inverse problem.
    El Badia A
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():102. PubMed ID: 16012607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct reconstruction algorithm of current dipoles for vector magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Nara T; Oohama J; Hashimoto M; Takeda T; Ando S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3859-79. PubMed ID: 17664582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A solution to the dynamical inverse problem of EEG generation using spatiotemporal Kalman filtering.
    Galka A; Yamashita O; Ozaki T; Biscay R; Valdés-Sosa P
    Neuroimage; 2004 Oct; 23(2):435-53. PubMed ID: 15488394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lp norm iterative sparse solution for EEG source Localization.
    Xu P; Tian Y; Chen H; Yao D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Mar; 54(3):400-9. PubMed ID: 17355051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variational Bayesian inversion of the equivalent current dipole model in EEG/MEG.
    Kiebel SJ; Daunizeau J; Phillips C; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(2):728-41. PubMed ID: 17951076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the estimation of the number of dipole sources in EEG source localization.
    Bai X; He B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 116(9):2037-43. PubMed ID: 16043395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical utility of current-generation dipole modelling of scalp EEG.
    Plummer C; Litewka L; Farish S; Harvey AS; Cook MJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Nov; 118(11):2344-61. PubMed ID: 17889598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anatomically constrained dipole adjustment (ANACONDA) for accurate MEG/EEG focal source localizations.
    Im CH; Jung HK; Fujimaki N
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4931-53. PubMed ID: 16204881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A global sensitivity analysis of three- and four-layer EEG conductivity models.
    Vallaghé S; Clerc M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Apr; 56(4):988-95. PubMed ID: 19272874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian spatio-temporal approach for EEG source reconstruction: conciliating ECD and distributed models.
    Daunizeau J; Mattout J; Clonda D; Goulard B; Benali H; Lina JM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Mar; 53(3):503-16. PubMed ID: 16532777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of measurement noise and electrode density on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution with different resistivity values for the skull.
    Ryynänen OR; Hyttinen JA; Malmivuo JA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1851-8. PubMed ID: 16941841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-way matrix analysis, the MUSIC algorithm and the coupled dipole model.
    de Munck JC; Bijma F
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Sep; 183(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 19591868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using ICA and realistic BOLD models to obtain joint EEG/fMRI solutions to the problem of source localization.
    Brookings T; Ortigue S; Grafton S; Carlson J
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(2):411-20. PubMed ID: 18845263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring directional coupling between EEG sources.
    Gómez-Herrero G; Atienza M; Egiazarian K; Cantero JL
    Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(3):497-508. PubMed ID: 18707006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of quasi-static magnetic reciprocity to finite element models of the MEG lead-field.
    Schimpf PH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 54(11):2082-8. PubMed ID: 18018704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A neural mass model for the simulation of cortical activity estimated from high resolution EEG during cognitive or motor tasks.
    Zavaglia M; Astolfi L; Babiloni F; Ursino M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Oct; 157(2):317-29. PubMed ID: 16757033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A model-based objective evaluation of eye movement correction in EEG recordings.
    Kierkels JJ; van Boxtel GJ; Vogten LL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Feb; 53(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 16485753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A hybrid algorithm for solving the EEG inverse problem from spatio-temporal EEG data.
    Crevecoeur G; Hallez H; Van Hese P; D'Asseler Y; Dupré L; Van de Walle R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2008 Aug; 46(8):767-77. PubMed ID: 18427852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concentration maximization and local basis expansions (LBEX) for linear inverse problems.
    Mitra PP; Maniar H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1775-82. PubMed ID: 16941833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.