These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16012620)

  • 1. Regional resolving power of combined MEG/EEG.
    Pflieger ME; Greenblatt RE; Kirkish J
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():79. PubMed ID: 16012620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multimodal integration of EEG, MEG and fMRI data for the solution of the neuroimage puzzle.
    Babiloni F; Mattia D; Babiloni C; Astolfi L; Salinari S; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Marciani MG; Cincotti F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1471-6. PubMed ID: 15707796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct reconstruction algorithm of current dipoles for vector magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Nara T; Oohama J; Hashimoto M; Takeda T; Ando S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3859-79. PubMed ID: 17664582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: methods and validation.
    Darvas F; Pantazis D; Kucukaltun-Yildirim E; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2004; 23 Suppl 1():S289-99. PubMed ID: 15501098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linear inverse solutions: simulations from a realistic head model in MEG.
    Soufflet L; Boeijinga PH
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 16341577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography.
    Ossenblok P; de Munck JC; Colon A; Drolsbach W; Boon P
    Epilepsia; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2139-49. PubMed ID: 17662061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence.
    Winter WR; Nunez PL; Ding J; Srinivasan R
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):3946-57. PubMed ID: 17607723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A technique to consider mismatches between fMRI and EEG/MEG sources for fMRI-constrained EEG/MEG source imaging: a preliminary simulation study.
    Im CH; Lee SY
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6005-21. PubMed ID: 17110766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinguishing between moving and stationary sources using EEG/MEG measurements with an application to epilepsy.
    Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Lewine JD; Muravchik CH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 15759577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrated MEG/EEG and fMRI model based on neural masses.
    Babajani A; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1794-801. PubMed ID: 16941835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MEG and EEG source localization in beamspace.
    Rodríguez-Rivera A; Baryshnikov BV; Van Veen BD; Wakai RT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Mar; 53(3):430-41. PubMed ID: 16532769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of skull resistivity on the spatial resolutions of EEG and MEG.
    Malmivuo JA; Suihko VE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 51(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 15248545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multiresolution framework to MEG/EEG source imaging.
    Gavit L; Baillet S; Mangin JF; Pescatore J; Garnero L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Oct; 48(10):1080-7. PubMed ID: 11585031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An automatic procedure for the analysis of electric and magnetic mismatch negativity based on anatomical brain mapping.
    Zvyagintsev M; Thönnessen H; Dammers J; Boers F; Mathiak K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 168(2):325-33. PubMed ID: 18093661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probabilistic forward model for electroencephalography source analysis.
    Plis SM; George JS; Jun SC; Ranken DM; Volegov PL; Schmidt DM
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):5309-27. PubMed ID: 17762088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An improved boundary element method for realistic volume-conductor modeling.
    Fuchs M; Drenckhahn R; Wischmann HA; Wagner M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Aug; 45(8):980-97. PubMed ID: 9691573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.