These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16012631)

  • 41. [Multiple dipole source localization from spatio-temporal EEG data by Quasi-Newton-ICA method].
    Zou L; Zhu S; He B
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Dec; 23(6):1206-12. PubMed ID: 17228710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Integrated MEG/EEG and fMRI model based on neural masses.
    Babajani A; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1794-801. PubMed ID: 16941835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Variational Bayesian inversion of the equivalent current dipole model in EEG/MEG.
    Kiebel SJ; Daunizeau J; Phillips C; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(2):728-41. PubMed ID: 17951076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Multi-Resolution FOCUSS: a source imaging technique applied to MEG data.
    Moran JE; Bowyer SM; Tepley N
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 16193262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. How many channels are needed for MEG?
    Vrba J; Robinson SE; McCubbin J
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():99. PubMed ID: 16012656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Application of quasi-static magnetic reciprocity to finite element models of the MEG lead-field.
    Schimpf PH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 54(11):2082-8. PubMed ID: 18018704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Combining sparsity and rotational invariance in EEG/MEG source reconstruction.
    Haufe S; Nikulin VV; Ziehe A; Müller KR; Nolte G
    Neuroimage; 2008 Aug; 42(2):726-38. PubMed ID: 18583157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of mutual information on independent component analysis in EEG/MEG analysis: a simulation study.
    Neumann A; Grosse-Wentrup M; Buss M; Gramann K
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 118(11):1534-46. PubMed ID: 18853332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison and improvements of LCMV and MUSIC source localization techniques for use in real clinical environments.
    Hoyos Ad; Portillo J; Portillo I; Marín P; Maestú F; Poch-Broto J; Ortiz T; Hernando A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Apr; 205(2):312-23. PubMed ID: 22330793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Efficient localization of synchronous EEG source activities using a modified RAP-MUSIC algorithm.
    Liu H; Schimpf PH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Apr; 53(4):652-61. PubMed ID: 16602571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
    Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Inverse modeling on decomposed electroencephalographic data: a way forward?
    Lelic D; Gratkowski M; Valeriani M; Arendt-Nielsen L; Drewes AM
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Aug; 26(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 19584750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of holes on EEG forward solutions using a realistic geometry head model.
    Li J; Wang K; Zhu S; He B
    J Neural Eng; 2007 Sep; 4(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 17873421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Using ICA and realistic BOLD models to obtain joint EEG/fMRI solutions to the problem of source localization.
    Brookings T; Ortigue S; Grafton S; Carlson J
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(2):411-20. PubMed ID: 18845263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Dipole localization using simulated intracerebral EEG.
    Chang N; Gulrajani R; Gotman J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Nov; 116(11):2707-16. PubMed ID: 16214401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Bayesian M/EEG source reconstruction with spatio-temporal priors.
    Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Aubert-Vázquez E; Penny WD
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):318-35. PubMed ID: 17904869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An automatic procedure for the analysis of electric and magnetic mismatch negativity based on anatomical brain mapping.
    Zvyagintsev M; Thönnessen H; Dammers J; Boers F; Mathiak K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 168(2):325-33. PubMed ID: 18093661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Spatio-temporal modeling of neuromagnetic data: I. Multi-source location versus time-course estimation accuracy.
    Supek S; Aine CJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 1997; 5(3):139-53. PubMed ID: 20408212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.