BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16012679)

  • 1. Continuous head-localization and data correction in a whole-cortex MEG sensor.
    Wilson HS
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():56. PubMed ID: 16012679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MEG recordings of DC fields using the signal space separation method (SSS).
    Taulu S; Simola J; Kajola M
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():35. PubMed ID: 16012635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artifact and head movement compensation in MEG.
    Medvedovsky M; Taulu S; Bikmullina R; Paetau R
    Neurol Neurophysiol Neurosci; 2007 Oct; ():4. PubMed ID: 18066426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On-scalp MEG sensor localization using magnetic dipole-like coils: A method for highly accurate co-registration.
    Pfeiffer C; Ruffieux S; Andersen LM; Kalabukhov A; Winkler D; Oostenveld R; Lundqvist D; Schneiderman JF
    Neuroimage; 2020 May; 212():116686. PubMed ID: 32119981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of head movement correction and spatiotemporal signal space separation in magnetoencephalography.
    Nenonen J; Nurminen J; Kičić D; Bikmullina R; Lioumis P; Jousmäki V; Taulu S; Parkkonen L; Putaala M; Kähkönen S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Nov; 123(11):2180-91. PubMed ID: 22633918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined MEG and EEG methodology for non-invasive recording of infraslow activity in the human cortex.
    Leistner S; Sander T; Burghoff M; Curio G; Trahms L; Mackert BM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2774-80. PubMed ID: 17905653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Co-registration of magnetoencephalography with magnetic resonance imaging using bite-bar-based fiducials and surface-matching.
    Adjamian P; Barnes GR; Hillebrand A; Holliday IE; Singh KD; Furlong PL; Harrington E; Barclay CW; Route PJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):691-8. PubMed ID: 15036065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence.
    Winter WR; Nunez PL; Ding J; Srinivasan R
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):3946-57. PubMed ID: 17607723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A bi-planar coil system for nulling background magnetic fields in scalp mounted magnetoencephalography.
    Holmes N; Leggett J; Boto E; Roberts G; Hill RM; Tierney TM; Shah V; Barnes GR; Brookes MJ; Bowtell R
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():760-774. PubMed ID: 30031934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement of neuromagnetic brain function in pre-school children with custom sized MEG.
    Tesan G; Johnson BW; Reid M; Thornton R; Crain S
    J Vis Exp; 2010 Feb; (36):. PubMed ID: 20173730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Localizing on-scalp MEG sensors using an array of magnetic dipole coils.
    Pfeiffer C; Andersen LM; Lundqvist D; Hämäläinen M; Schneiderman JF; Oostenveld R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0191111. PubMed ID: 29746486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Online and offline tools for head movement compensation in MEG.
    Stolk A; Todorovic A; Schoffelen JM; Oostenveld R
    Neuroimage; 2013 Mar; 68():39-48. PubMed ID: 23246857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Virtual MEG Helmet: Computer Simulation of an Approach to Neuromagnetic Field Sampling.
    Medvedovsky M; Nenonen J; Koptelova A; Butorina A; Paetau R; Mäkelä JP; Ahonen A; Simola J; Gazit T; Taulu S
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2016 Mar; 20(2):539-48. PubMed ID: 25616085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forward solution ambiguity for fMEG model.
    Vrba J; Robinson SE; McCubbin J
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():87. PubMed ID: 16012660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MEG versus EEG: influence of background activity on interictal spike detection.
    Ramantani G; Boor R; Paetau R; Ille N; Feneberg R; Rupp A; Boppel T; Scherg M; Rating D; Bast T
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Dec; 23(6):498-508. PubMed ID: 17143138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advanced electronics for the CTF MEG system.
    McCubbin J; Vrba J; Spear P; McKenzie D; Willis R; Loewen R; Robinson SE; Fife AA
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():69. PubMed ID: 16012695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates.
    Lin FH; Witzel T; Ahlfors SP; Stufflebeam SM; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):160-71. PubMed ID: 16520063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Whole-head SQUID system in a superconducting magnetic shield.
    Ohta H; Matsui T; Uchikawa Y
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():58. PubMed ID: 16012595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of an MEG device as 3D digitizer and motion monitoring system.
    de Munck JC; Verbunt JP; Van't Ent D; Van Dijk BW
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Aug; 46(8):2041-52. PubMed ID: 11512609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The unique determination of the primary current by MEG and EEG.
    Peng L; Cheng J; Jin L
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5565-80. PubMed ID: 17047270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.