These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16013238)

  • 1. [Inertial effects on interface pressure between prosthetic socket and residual limb].
    Jia X; Zhang M; Wang R; Fan Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jun; 22(3):468-71. PubMed ID: 16013238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A quasi-dynamic nonlinear finite element model to investigate prosthetic interface stresses during walking for trans-tibial amputees.
    Jia X; Zhang M; Li X; Lee WC
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Jul; 20(6):630-5. PubMed ID: 15878224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generic, geometric finite element analysis of the transtibial residual limb and prosthetic socket.
    Silver-Thorn MB; Childress DS
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1997 Apr; 34(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 9108344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of computational analysis with clinical measurement of stresses on below-knee residual limb in a prosthetic socket.
    Zhang M; Roberts C
    Med Eng Phys; 2000 Nov; 22(9):607-12. PubMed ID: 11259929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Load transfer mechanics between trans-tibial prosthetic socket and residual limb--dynamic effects.
    Jia X; Zhang M; Lee WC
    J Biomech; 2004 Sep; 37(9):1371-7. PubMed ID: 15275844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Static and dynamic pressure prediction for prosthetic socket fitting assessment utilising an inverse problem approach.
    Sewell P; Noroozi S; Vinney J; Amali R; Andrews S
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jan; 54(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 21963113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parametric analysis using the finite element method to investigate prosthetic interface stresses for persons with trans-tibial amputation.
    Silver-Thorn MB; Childress DS
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1996 Jul; 33(3):227-38. PubMed ID: 8823671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element modeling of the contact interface between trans-tibial residual limb and prosthetic socket.
    Lee WC; Zhang M; Jia X; Cheung JT
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Oct; 26(8):655-62. PubMed ID: 15471693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Normal and shear stresses on a residual limb in a prosthetic socket during ambulation: comparison of finite element results with experimental measurements.
    Sanders JE; Daly CH
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(2):191-204. PubMed ID: 8035348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Three-dimensional finite element analyses on the transtibial residual limb and its prosthetic socket].
    Zhang M; Mak AF; Fan Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Dec; 17(4):403-6. PubMed ID: 11211825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis of the contact interface between trans-femoral stump and prosthetic socket.
    Zhang L; Zhu M; Shen L; Zheng F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1270-3. PubMed ID: 24109926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of alignment on interface pressure for transtibial amputee during walking.
    Jia X; Suo S; Meng F; Wang R
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2008 Nov; 3(6):339-43. PubMed ID: 19127605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The quasi-static response of compliant prosthetic sockets for transtibial amputees using finite element methods.
    Faustini MC; Neptune RR; Crawford RH
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Mar; 28(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 15941666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic interface pressure distributions of two transtibial prosthetic socket concepts.
    Dumbleton T; Buis AW; McFadyen A; McHugh BF; McKay G; Murray KD; Sexton S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 19675992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interface mechanics in lower-limb external prosthetics: a review of finite element models.
    Zachariah SG; Sanders JE
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1996 Dec; 4(4):288-302. PubMed ID: 8973955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A finite element model to assess transtibial prosthetic sockets with elastomeric liners.
    Cagle JC; Reinhall PG; Allyn KJ; McLean J; Hinrichs P; Hafner BJ; Sanders JE
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Jul; 56(7):1227-1240. PubMed ID: 29235055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frictional action at lower limb/prosthetic socket interface.
    Zhang M; Turner-Smith AR; Roberts VC; Tanner A
    Med Eng Phys; 1996 Apr; 18(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 8718946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling the interactions between a prosthetic socket, polyurethane liners and the residual limb in transtibial amputees using non-linear finite element analysis.
    Simpson G; Fisher C; Wright DK
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2001; 37():343-7. PubMed ID: 11347414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A pneumatic reconfigurable socket for transtibial amputees.
    Mollaee S; Fuentes-Aguilar RQ; Huegel JC; Budgett DM; Taberner AJ; Nielsen PMF
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2024 Feb; 40(2):e3801. PubMed ID: 38185908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss.
    Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.