These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

619 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16013727)

  • 1. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
    Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ; Reimann DA
    Med Phys; 1998 Jan; 25(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 9472832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
    Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of the modulation transfer function using the edge method: influence of scattered radiation.
    Neitzel U; Buhr E; Hilgers G; Granfors PR
    Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3485-91. PubMed ID: 15651631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image.
    Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2323-31. PubMed ID: 14528954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function.
    Samei E; Ranger NT; Dobbins JT; Chen Y
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1454-65. PubMed ID: 16752580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of the modulation transfer function of digital X-ray detectors with an opaque edge-test device.
    Illers H; Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15933111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An effective method to verify line and point spread functions measured in computed tomography.
    Ohkubo M; Wada S; Matsumoto T; Nishizawa K
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2757-64. PubMed ID: 16964851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector.
    Saunders RS; Samei E; Jesneck JL; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):588-99. PubMed ID: 15789606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images.
    Saunders RS; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):3006-17. PubMed ID: 14655948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An algorithm for automated modulation transfer function measurement using an edge of a PMMA phantom: Impact of field of view on spatial resolution of CT images.
    Anam C; Fujibuchi T; Budi WS; Haryanto F; Dougherty G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):244-252. PubMed ID: 30338920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
    Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conditioning data for calculation of the modulation transfer function.
    Maidment AD; Albert M
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 12607842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I.
    Bloomquist AK; Yaffe MJ; Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Mawdsley GE; Bright S; Shen SZ; Mahesh M; Nickoloff EL; Fleischman RC; Williams MB; Maidment AD; Beideck DJ; Och J; Seibert JA
    Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):719-36. PubMed ID: 16878575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Techniques to improve the accuracy of presampling MTF measurement in digital X-ray imaging based on constrained spline regression.
    Zhou Z; Zhu Q; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ma W; Gao F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Apr; 61(4):1339-49. PubMed ID: 24658257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.