159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16014109)
1. Arguments for a magnetic resonance imaging-assisted FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Narayan K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(4):573-82. PubMed ID: 16014109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging-assisted FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Soutter WP; deSouza N
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(3):1487; author reply 1488. PubMed ID: 16803557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI of cervical cancer with a surgical perspective: staging, prognostic implications and pitfalls.
Balcacer P; Shergill A; Litkouhi B
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2557-2571. PubMed ID: 30903231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance of FIGO 2018 staging of loco-regionally advanced cervical cancer (LRACC) with the use of MRI and PET and implications for treatment selection.
Lin MY; Mileshkin L; McNally O; Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S; Narayan K
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Feb; 169():91-97. PubMed ID: 36521354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Revised FIGO Staging for Cervical Cancer - A New Role for MRI.
Merz J; Bossart M; Bamberg F; Eisenblaetter M
Rofo; 2020 Oct; 192(10):937-944. PubMed ID: 32731266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FIGO 2018 staging criteria for cervical cancer: Impact on stage migration and survival.
Grigsby PW; Massad LS; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Thaker PH; McCourt C; Hagemann A; Fuh K; Kuroki L; Schwarz JK; Markovina S; Lin AJ; Dehdashti F; Siegel BA
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jun; 157(3):639-643. PubMed ID: 32248993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (stage IB-IIB): evaluation using magnetic resonance].
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni L; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 2236692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Uterine cervical cancer : preoperative staging with magnetic resonance imaging].
Collettini F; Hamm B
Radiologe; 2011 Jul; 51(7):589-95. PubMed ID: 21688026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nuclear imaging and cervical cancer.
Grigsby PW
Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Feb; 61(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 19204660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging.
Salib MY; Russell JHB; Stewart VR; Sudderuddin SA; Barwick TD; Rockall AG; Bharwani N
Radiographics; 2020 Oct; 40(6):1807-1822. PubMed ID: 32946322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of carcinoma cervix using magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with clinical FIGO staging and impact on management.
Dhoot NM; Kumar V; Shinagare A; Kataki AC; Barmon D; Bhuyan U
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Feb; 56(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 22339747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to clinical staging in cervical carcinoma.
Bhosale P; Peungjesada S; Devine C; Balachandran A; Iyer R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 21084900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Managing advanced-stage cervical cancer.
Allen D; Narayan K
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 19(4):591-609. PubMed ID: 16150395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer.
Wagenaar HC; Trimbos JB; Postema S; Anastasopoulou A; van der Geest RJ; Reiber JH; Kenter GG; Peters AA; Pattynama PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 11520143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and validation of a surgical-pathologic staging and scoring system for cervical cancer.
Li S; Li X; Zhang Y; Zhou H; Tang F; Jia Y; Hu T; Sun H; Yang R; Chen Y; Cheng X; Lv W; Wu L; Zhou J; Wang S; Huang K; Wang L; Yao Y; Yang Q; Yang X; Zhang Q; Han X; Lin Z; Xing H; Qu P; Cai H; Song X; Tian X; Shen J; Xi L; Li K; Deng D; Wang H; Wang C; Wu M; Zhu T; Chen G; Gao Q; Wang S; Hu J; Kong B; Xie X; Ma D
Oncotarget; 2016 Apr; 7(15):21054-63. PubMed ID: 27014971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implications of the new FIGO staging and the role of imaging in cervical cancer.
Kido A; Nakamoto Y
Br J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 94(1125):20201342. PubMed ID: 33989030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage.
Shin KE; Park BK; Kim CK; Bae DS; Song SY; Kim B
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):818-24. PubMed ID: 21742787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
