429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16014549)
1. Comparison of different test systems for simultaneous autoantibody detection in connective tissue diseases.
Eissfeller P; Sticherling M; Scholz D; Hennig K; Lüttich T; Motz M; Kromminga A
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Jun; 1050():327-39. PubMed ID: 16014549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a novel line-blot immunoassay for the detection of antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens.
Damoiseaux J; Boesten K; Giesen J; Austen J; Tervaert JW
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Jun; 1050():340-7. PubMed ID: 16014550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison between line immunoassay (LIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the determination of antibodies to extractable nuclear antigenes (ENA) with reference to other laboratory results and clinical features].
Maclachlan D; Vogt P; Wu X; Rose L; Tyndall A; Hasler P
Z Rheumatol; 2002 Oct; 61(5):534-44. PubMed ID: 12399881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laboratory screening of connective tissue diseases by a new automated ENA screening assay (EliA Symphony) in clinically defined patients.
González C; García-Berrocal B; Pérez M; Navajo JA; Herraez O; González-Buitrago JM
Clin Chim Acta; 2005 Sep; 359(1-2):109-14. PubMed ID: 15894301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of multiplexed fluorescent microsphere immunoassay for detection of autoantibodies to nuclear antigens.
Martins TB; Burlingame R; von Mühlen CA; Jaskowski TD; Litwin CM; Hill HR
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2004 Nov; 11(6):1054-9. PubMed ID: 15539505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Detection of anti-ENA autoantibodies in patients with systemic connective tissue diseases. Analytical variability and diagnostic sensitivity of 4 methods].
Villalta D; Bizzaro N; Tonutti E; Visentin D; Manoni F; Piazza A; Toffolo L; Rizzotti P; Clemen P; Pradella M; Bassetti D; Tozzoli R
Recenti Prog Med; 1999 Nov; 90(11):579-84. PubMed ID: 10608146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of autoantibodies using multiplex methodology in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Hanly JG; Thompson K; McCurdy G; Fougere L; Theriault C; Wilton K
J Immunol Methods; 2010 Jan; 352(1-2):147-52. PubMed ID: 19836394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme immunoassay methods for the determination of antinuclear antibodies].
Yilmaz O; Karaman M; Ergon MC; Bahar IH; Yuluğ N
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2004; 38(1-2):85-90. PubMed ID: 15293906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiplexed AtheNA multi-lyte immunoassay for ANA screening in autoimmune diseases.
Shovman O; Gilburd B; Zandman-Goddard G; Yehiely A; Langevitz P; Shoenfeld Y
Autoimmunity; 2005 Feb; 38(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 15804711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 ANA screen for the detection of antinuclear antibodies and comparison with conventional methods.
Desplat-Jego S; Bardin N; Larida B; Sanmarco M
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Aug; 1109():245-55. PubMed ID: 17785313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiplex assessment of non-organ-specific autoantibodies with a novel microbead-based immunoassay.
Grossmann K; Roggenbuck D; Schröder C; Conrad K; Schierack P; Sack U
Cytometry A; 2011 Feb; 79(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 21265005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Detection of anti-ENA and anti-dsDNA antibodies using line immunoassay in systemic autoimmune diseases].
Kim JM; Ihm CH; Sin DH; Ihm MK; Sim SC
Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Oct; 28(5):353-61. PubMed ID: 18971616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Detection of anti-SSA/Ro antibody by ELISA, double immunodiffusion, and immunoblotting: a comparative study].
Tong SQ; Shi Q; Wen XH; Gan XD; Shi YP; Zhao Y; Zeng XF; Zhang FC; Dong Y
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 86(35):2455-7. PubMed ID: 17156670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of a multiplex, bead-based fluorescent assay and immunofluorescence methods for the detection of ANA and ANCA autoantibodies in human serum.
Nifli AP; Notas G; Mamoulaki M; Niniraki M; Ampartzaki V; Theodoropoulos PA; Kopnitsky MJ; Castanas E
J Immunol Methods; 2006 Apr; 311(1-2):189-97. PubMed ID: 16554066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effective detection of non-antidouble-stranded DNA antinuclear antibody specificities in daily clinical practice.
Vos PA; Bast EJ; Derksen RH
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2006 May; 45(5):629-35. PubMed ID: 16368728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficiency of different strategies to detect autoantibodies to extractable nuclear antigens.
Almeida González D; Cabrera de León A; Rodríguez Pérez Mdel C; Brito Díaz B; González Hernández A; García García D; Vázquez Moncholi C; Aguirre Jaime A
J Immunol Methods; 2010 Aug; 360(1-2):89-95. PubMed ID: 20600078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a new screening strategy for anti-extractable nuclear antigen antibodies.
Van Praet JT; Vander Cruyssen B; Bonroy C; Smith V; Delanghe J; De Keyser F
Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2009; 27(6):971-6. PubMed ID: 20149314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved serological differentiation between systemic lupus erythematosus and mixed connective tissue disease by use of an SmD3 peptide-based immunoassay.
Mahler M; Stinton LM; Fritzler MJ
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 15642993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of anti-ribosomal P protein immunoassay in Japanese patients with connective tissue diseases: comparison with an indirect immunofluorescence assay.
Muro Y; Sugiura K; Morita Y; Tomita Y
Scand J Rheumatol; 2009; 38(6):460-3. PubMed ID: 19922022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of antinuclear antibody profiles obtained using line immunoassay and fluorescence enzyme immunoassay.
Jang J; Kim S; Kim HS; Lee KA; Park J; Park Y
J Int Med Res; 2021 Jun; 49(6):3000605211014390. PubMed ID: 34154430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
