134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16015160)
1. ECAP, ESR and subjective levels for two different nucleus 24 electrode arrays.
Polak M; Hodges A; Balkany T
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Jul; 26(4):639-45. PubMed ID: 16015160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.
He S; Shahsavarani BS; McFayden TC; Wang H; Gill KE; Xu L; Chao X; Luo J; Wang R; He N
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):238-250. PubMed ID: 28678078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evoked stapedius reflex and compound action potential thresholds versus most comfortable loudness level: assessment of their relation for charge-based fitting strategies in implant users.
Walkowiak A; Lorens A; Polak M; Kostek B; Skarzynski H; Szkielkowska A; Skarzynski PH
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011; 73(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 21659787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of cochlear implant electrode array design on auditory nerve and behavioral response in children.
Telmesani LM; Said NM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 May; 79(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 25746517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays.
Hughes ML; Abbas PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1538-47. PubMed ID: 16583899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
Telmesani LM; Said NM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children.
Gordin A; Papsin B; James A; Gordon K
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):908-15. PubMed ID: 19730148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing eSRT and eCAP measurements in pediatric MED-EL cochlear implant users.
Kosaner J; Spitzer P; Bayguzina S; Gultekin M; Behar LA
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 29291688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth functions and HiResolution programming levels in pediatric CII implant subjects.
Eisen MD; Franck KH
Ear Hear; 2004 Dec; 25(6):528-38. PubMed ID: 15604914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array.
Brill S; Müller J; Hagen R; Möltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I; Strahl S
Biomed Eng Online; 2009 Dec; 8():40. PubMed ID: 20015362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
Cohen LT
Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential and speech perception: a study in cochlear implant users with short electrode array.
Kim JR; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Kim LS
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1041-8. PubMed ID: 20634770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maximum acceptable level for the determination of ECAP and ESRT in a paediatric population.
Di Berardino F; Cavicchiolo S; Del Carmen Fuentes M; Kontides A; Lauss K; Zanetti D
Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Jul; 23(4):214-224. PubMed ID: 35380097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and behavioral T-levels in implanted children with cochlear nerve deficiency.
Chao X; Wang R; Luo J; Wang H; Fan Z; Xu L
Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4309. PubMed ID: 36922582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is There Any Correlation between Spread of Excitation Width and the Refractory Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Cochlear Implant Users?
Coutinho da Silva J; Schmidt Goffi-Gomez MV; Tsuji RK; Bento R; Brito Neto R
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 32998132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
