These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1601530)

  • 1. A distribution-free procedure for the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies.
    Hauschke D; Steinijans VW; Diletti E
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992; 30 Suppl 1():S37-43. PubMed ID: 1601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A distribution-free procedure for the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies.
    Hauschke D; Steinijans VW; Diletti E
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1990 Feb; 28(2):72-8. PubMed ID: 2307548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Update on the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies.
    Steinijans VW; Hauschke D
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992; 30 Suppl 1():S45-50. PubMed ID: 1601531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment by means of confidence intervals.
    Diletti E; Hauschke D; Steinijans VW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992; 30 Suppl 1():S51-8. PubMed ID: 1601532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Update on the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies.
    Steinijans VW; Hauschke D
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1990 Mar; 28(3):105-10. PubMed ID: 2318545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment by means of confidence intervals.
    Diletti E; Hauschke D; Steinijans VW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1991 Jan; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 2004861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size determination: extended tables for the multiplicative model and bioequivalence ranges of 0.9 to 1.11 and 0.7 to 1.43.
    Diletti E; Hauschke D; Steinijans VW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992 Aug; 30(8):287-90. PubMed ID: 1526691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Review and use of decision rules for bioequivalence trials].
    Nicolas P; Tod M; Petitjean O
    Therapie; 1993; 48(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 8356540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size determination: extended tables for the multiplicative model and bioequivalence ranges of 0.9 to 1.11 and 0.7 to 1.43.
    Diletti E; Hauschke D; Steinijans VW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992; 30 Suppl 1():S59-62. PubMed ID: 1601533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choice of student's t- or Wilcoxon-based confidence intervals for assessment of average bioequivalence.
    Hauck WW; Hauschke D; Diletti E; Bois FY; Steinijans VW; Anderson S
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):179-89. PubMed ID: 9056597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On TIER method for assessment of individual bioequivalence.
    Ju HL
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 9056589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Types of bioequivalence and related statistical considerations.
    Hauck WW; Anderson S
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992 May; 30(5):181-7. PubMed ID: 1592546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust and bootstrap testing procedures for bioequivalence.
    Shen CF; Iglewicz B
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Mar; 4(1):65-90. PubMed ID: 8019585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Statistical tests for bioequivalence].
    Peil H; Häselbarth V
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1985; 35(10):1489-94. PubMed ID: 4074402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of outlying subjects on decision of bioequivalence.
    Ki FY; Liu JP; Wang W; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 1995 Mar; 5(1):71-94. PubMed ID: 7613561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discussion of individual bioequivalence by M.-L. Chen.
    Gould AL
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 9056584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A two one-sided tests procedure for assessment of individual bioequivalence.
    Liu J; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 9056588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trimmed weighted Simes' test for two one-sided hypotheses with arbitrarily correlated test statistics.
    Brannath W; Bretz F; Maurer W; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):885-98. PubMed ID: 20014203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Average bioequivalence of two oral formulations of fluconazole in healthy subjects after multiple dosing.
    Atanasova I; Bozhinova K; Terziivanov D
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1999 Jun; 37(6):282-5. PubMed ID: 10395119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of metabolites--a new approach to bioequivalence studies of spironolactone formulations.
    Vergin H; Mahr G; Metz R; Eichinger A; Nitsche V; Martens H
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1997 Aug; 35(8):334-40. PubMed ID: 9266289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.