These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1601533)

  • 21. Sample size calculation for the Power Model for dose proportionality studies.
    Sethuraman VS; Leonov S; Squassante L; Mitchell TR; Hale MD
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 17323313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Equivalence assessment for interchangeability based on two-sided tests.
    Dong X; Tsong Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(6):1312-31. PubMed ID: 25032976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A three-step procedure for assessing bioequivalence in the general mixed model framework.
    Vuorinen J; Turunen J
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2635-55. PubMed ID: 8981677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction as an equivalence problem.
    Steinijans VW; Hartmann M; Huber R; Radtke HW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1996 May; 34(1 Suppl):S25-30. PubMed ID: 8793601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of outlying subjects on decision of bioequivalence.
    Ki FY; Liu JP; Wang W; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 1995 Mar; 5(1):71-94. PubMed ID: 7613561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Non-inferiority trials: the 'at least as good as' criterion.
    Laster LL; Johnson MF
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 12520556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sequential designs for equivalence studies.
    Whitehead J
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2703-15. PubMed ID: 8981681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Review of statistical procedures for determining the equivalency of two treatments].
    Com-Nougue C; Rodary C
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1987; 35(5):416-30. PubMed ID: 3324228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Average bioequivalence of two oral formulations of fluconazole in healthy subjects after multiple dosing.
    Atanasova I; Bozhinova K; Terziivanov D
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1999 Jun; 37(6):282-5. PubMed ID: 10395119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Variation of Cmax and Cmax/AUC in investigations of bioequivalence.
    Endrenyi L; Yan W
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):184-9. PubMed ID: 8500920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of the reference scaled bioequivalence semi-replicate method with other approaches: focus on human exposure to drugs.
    Karalis V; Symillides M; Macheras P
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Aug; 38(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 19524039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
    Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sample size determination for equivalence assessment with multiple endpoints.
    Sun A; Dong X; Tsong Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(6):1203-14. PubMed ID: 25032845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vitro bioequivalence testing.
    Chow SC; Shao J; Wang H
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 12486751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Presentation of the intrasubject coefficient of variation for sample size planning in bioequivalence studies.
    Hauschke D; Steinijans WV; Diletti E; Schall R; Luus HG; Elze M; Blume H
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1994 Jul; 32(7):376-8. PubMed ID: 7952801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sample size determination for a three-arm equivalence trial of normally distributed responses.
    Chang YW; Tsong Y; Dong X; Zhao Z
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(6):1190-202. PubMed ID: 25098678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reference tables for the intrasubject coefficient of variation in bioequivalence studies.
    Steinijans VW; Sauter R; Hauschke D; Diletti E; Schall R; Luus HG; Elze M; Blume H; Hoffmann C; Franke G
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1995 Aug; 33(8):427-30. PubMed ID: 8556220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimization of testing times and critical values in sequential equivalence testing.
    Müller HH; Schäfer H
    Stat Med; 1999 Jul; 18(14):1769-88; discussion 1789. PubMed ID: 10407247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exploratory assessment of dose proportionality: review of current approaches and proposal for a practical criterion.
    Hummel J; McKendrick S; Brindley C; French R
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 18386766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Average bioequivalence for two-sequence two-period crossover design with incomplete data.
    Lee JY; Kim BC; Park SG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):857-67. PubMed ID: 16078389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.