BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1601610)

  • 1. The use of continuous and discrete confidence judgments in receiver operating characteristic studies of diagnostic imaging techniques.
    Rockette HE; Gur D; Metz CE
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Feb; 27(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 1601610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binary and multi-category ratings in a laboratory observer performance study: a comparison.
    Gur D; Bandos AI; King JL; Klym AH; Cohen CS; Hakim CM; Hardesty LA; Ganott MA; Perrin RL; Poller WR; Shah R; Sumkin JH; Wallace LP; Rockette HE
    Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4404-9. PubMed ID: 18975686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quasi-continuous and discrete confidence rating scales for observer performance studies: Effects on ROC analysis.
    Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 17178364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary CT diagnosis of abdominal masses in a PACS environment.
    Straub WH; Gur D; Good WF; Campbell WL; Davis PL; Hecht ST; Skolnick ML; Thaete FL; Rosenthal MS; Sashin D
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):739-43. PubMed ID: 1994411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in lung cancer screening at chest MDCT: ROC analysis of CAD versus radiologist performance.
    Fraioli F; Bertoletti L; Napoli A; Pediconi F; Calabrese FA; Masciangelo R; Catalano C; Passariello R
    J Thorac Imaging; 2007 Aug; 22(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 17721333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.
    Slasky BS; Gur D; Good WF; Costa-Greco MA; Harris KM; Cooperstein LA; Rockette HE
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):775-80. PubMed ID: 2305061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Usefulness of an artificial neural network for differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules on high-resolution CT: evaluation with receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Matsuki Y; Nakamura K; Watanabe H; Aoki T; Nakata H; Katsuragawa S; Doi K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Mar; 178(3):657-63. PubMed ID: 11856693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems.
    Kim AY; Cho KS; Song KS; Kim JH; Kim JG; Ha HK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 11461856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection of a rating scale in receiver operating characteristic studies: some remaining issues.
    Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):245-8. PubMed ID: 18206624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?
    Gur D; Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Zuley ML; Hakim CM; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Sumkin JH
    Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 20236840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of Observer Performance for Reduced Radiation Dose Levels in CT: Eliminating Reduced Dose Levels That Are Too Low Is the First Step.
    Fletcher JG; Yu L; Fidler JL; Levin DL; DeLone DR; Hough DM; Takahashi N; Venkatesh SK; Sykes AG; White D; Lindell RM; Kotsenas AL; Campeau NG; Lehman VT; Bartley AC; Leng S; Holmes DR; Toledano AY; Carter RE; McCollough CH
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):876-890. PubMed ID: 28262519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction in dose from CT examinations of liver lesions with a new postprocessing filter: a ROC phantom study.
    Martinsen AC; Saether HK; Olsen DR; Skaane P; Olerud HM
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Apr; 49(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 18365819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection.
    Rubin GD; Lyo JK; Paik DS; Sherbondy AJ; Chow LC; Leung AN; Mindelzun R; Schraedley-Desmond PK; Zinck SE; Naidich DP; Napel S
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):274-83. PubMed ID: 15537839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An empirical comparison of discrete ratings and subjective probability ratings.
    Berbaum KS; Dorfman DD; Franken EA; Caldwell RT
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Jul; 9(7):756-63. PubMed ID: 12139089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical comparison of ROC curves from multiple readers.
    Swaving M; van Houwelingen H; Ottes FP; Steerneman T
    Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 8778532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A constrained formulation for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on probability summation.
    Swensson RG; King JL; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2001 Aug; 28(8):1597-609. PubMed ID: 11548929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lung nodule detection performance in five observers on computed tomography (CT) with adaptive iterative dose reduction using three-dimensional processing (AIDR 3D) in a Japanese multicenter study: Comparison between ultra-low-dose CT and low-dose CT by receiver-operating characteristic analysis.
    Nagatani Y; Takahashi M; Murata K; Ikeda M; Yamashiro T; Miyara T; Koyama H; Koyama M; Sato Y; Moriya H; Noma S; Tomiyama N; Ohno Y; Murayama S;
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1401-12. PubMed ID: 25892051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs.
    Kobayashi T; Xu XW; MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K
    Radiology; 1996 Jun; 199(3):843-8. PubMed ID: 8638015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a digital workstation for interpreting neonatal examinations. A receiver operating characteristic study.
    Franken EA; Berbaum KS; Marley SM; Smith WL; Sato Y; Kao SC; Milam SG
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Sep; 27(9):732-7. PubMed ID: 1399457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Receiver operating characteristic evaluation of computer display of adult portable chest radiographs.
    Krupinski EA; Maloney K; Bessen SC; Capp MP; Graham K; Hunt R; Lund P; Ovitt T; Standen JR
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Feb; 29(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 8169087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.