331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16018751)
1. Analysis of failed commercially pure titanium dental implants: a scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive spectrometer x-ray study.
Shibli JA; Marcantonio E; d'Avila S; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Periodontol; 2005 Jul; 76(7):1092-9. PubMed ID: 16018751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant surface analysis and microbiologic evaluation of failed implants retrieved from smokers.
Shibli JA; Vitussi TR; Garcia RV; Zenóbio EG; Ota-Tsuzuki C; Cassoni A; Piattelli A; d'Avila S
J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 17912965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of CO(2) laser irradiation on failed implant surfaces.
Shibli JA; Theodoro LH; Haypek P; Garcia VG; Marcantonio E
Implant Dent; 2004 Dec; 13(4):342-51. PubMed ID: 15591996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone response to a pure titanium implant surface modified by laser etching and microarc oxidation.
Guo Z; Zhou L; Rong M; Zhu A; Geng H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 20209195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surface analysis of failed oral titanium implants.
Esposito M; Lausmaa J; Hirsch JM; Thomsen P
J Biomed Mater Res; 1999; 48(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 10421701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The experimental research on two-generation BLB dental implants - part I: surface modification and osseointegration.
Yin K; Wang Z; Fan X; Bian Y; Guo J; Lan J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):846-52. PubMed ID: 21564304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration.
Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surface characterization of three titanium dental implants.
Fandridis J; Papadopoulos T
Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 18332762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The human bone-oxidized titanium implant interface: A light microscopic, scanning electron microscopic, back-scatter scanning electron microscopic, and energy-dispersive x-ray study of clinically retrieved dental implants.
Schüpbach P; Glauser R; Rocci A; Martignoni M; Sennerby L; Lundgren A; Gottlow J
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7 Suppl 1():S36-43. PubMed ID: 16137086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival of splinted mini-implants after contamination with stainless steel.
Jofré J; Conrady Y; Carrasco C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):351-6. PubMed ID: 20369095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants.
Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological characteristics of 14 dental implant surfaces.
Dohan Ehrenfest DM; Vazquez L; Park YJ; Sammartino G; Bernard JP
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Oct; 37(5):525-42. PubMed ID: 21728785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of ultraviolet photoactivation of titanium on osseointegration in a rat model.
Ueno T; Yamada M; Hori N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 20369086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between the surface chemical composition of implants and contact with the substrate.
Lima da Costa Valente M; Shimano AC; Marcantonio Junior E; Reis AC
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Feb; 41(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 23339297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microvascular changes after placement of titanium implants: scanning electron microscopy observations of machined and titanium plasma-sprayed implants in dogs.
Matsuo M; Nakamura T; Kishi Y; Takahashi K
J Periodontol; 1999 Nov; 70(11):1330-8. PubMed ID: 10588496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
