These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The effect of CO(2) laser irradiation on failed implant surfaces. Shibli JA; Theodoro LH; Haypek P; Garcia VG; Marcantonio E Implant Dent; 2004 Dec; 13(4):342-51. PubMed ID: 15591996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone response to a pure titanium implant surface modified by laser etching and microarc oxidation. Guo Z; Zhou L; Rong M; Zhu A; Geng H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 20209195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surface analysis of failed oral titanium implants. Esposito M; Lausmaa J; Hirsch JM; Thomsen P J Biomed Mater Res; 1999; 48(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 10421701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The experimental research on two-generation BLB dental implants - part I: surface modification and osseointegration. Yin K; Wang Z; Fan X; Bian Y; Guo J; Lan J Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):846-52. PubMed ID: 21564304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration. Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surface characterization of three titanium dental implants. Fandridis J; Papadopoulos T Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 18332762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The human bone-oxidized titanium implant interface: A light microscopic, scanning electron microscopic, back-scatter scanning electron microscopic, and energy-dispersive x-ray study of clinically retrieved dental implants. Schüpbach P; Glauser R; Rocci A; Martignoni M; Sennerby L; Lundgren A; Gottlow J Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7 Suppl 1():S36-43. PubMed ID: 16137086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival of splinted mini-implants after contamination with stainless steel. Jofré J; Conrady Y; Carrasco C Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):351-6. PubMed ID: 20369095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants. Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological characteristics of 14 dental implant surfaces. Dohan Ehrenfest DM; Vazquez L; Park YJ; Sammartino G; Bernard JP J Oral Implantol; 2011 Oct; 37(5):525-42. PubMed ID: 21728785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo. Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of ultraviolet photoactivation of titanium on osseointegration in a rat model. Ueno T; Yamada M; Hori N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 20369086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between the surface chemical composition of implants and contact with the substrate. Lima da Costa Valente M; Shimano AC; Marcantonio Junior E; Reis AC J Oral Implantol; 2015 Feb; 41(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 23339297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading. Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy. Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microvascular changes after placement of titanium implants: scanning electron microscopy observations of machined and titanium plasma-sprayed implants in dogs. Matsuo M; Nakamura T; Kishi Y; Takahashi K J Periodontol; 1999 Nov; 70(11):1330-8. PubMed ID: 10588496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis. Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]