These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16018765)

  • 21. In vitro and clinical evaluation of optical coherence tomography for the detection of subgingival calculus and root cementum.
    Tsubokawa M; Aoki A; Kakizaki S; Taniguchi Y; Ejiri K; Mizutani K; Koshy G; Akizuki T; Oda S; Sumi Y; Izumi Y
    J Oral Sci; 2018 Sep; 60(3):418-427. PubMed ID: 29794398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing in calculus removal.
    Rabbani GM; Ash MM; Caffesse RG
    J Periodontol; 1981 Mar; 52(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 7014822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Subgingival calculus detection with fluorescence induced by 655 nm InGaAsP diode laser radiation.
    Folwaczny M; Heym R; Mehl A; Hickel R
    J Periodontol; 2002 Jun; 73(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 12083531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detection of subgingival calculus and dentine caries by laser fluorescence.
    Kurihara E; Koseki T; Gohara K; Nishihara T; Ansai T; Takehara T
    J Periodontal Res; 2004 Feb; 39(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 14687229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on the root surface: morphologic analysis and efficiency of calculus removal.
    Ting CC; Fukuda M; Watanabe T; Aoki T; Sanaoka A; Noguchi T
    J Periodontol; 2007 Nov; 78(11):2156-64. PubMed ID: 17970683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of handling-relevant factors on the behaviour of a novel calculus-detection device.
    Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 15766378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A method for the validation of a new calculus detection system.
    Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kuhr A; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 32(6):659-64. PubMed ID: 15882227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative
    Rams TE; Manos MP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jan; 22(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 34002702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Instrument effects on smoothness discrimination.
    Schoen DH
    J Dent Educ; 1992 Nov; 56(11):741-5. PubMed ID: 1430530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Er:YAG laser scaling of diseased root surfaces.
    Frentzen M; Braun A; Aniol D
    J Periodontol; 2002 May; 73(5):524-30. PubMed ID: 12027255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The efficacy of subgingival calculus removal with endoscopy-aided scaling and root planing: a study on multirooted teeth.
    Michaud RM; Schoolfield J; Mellonig JT; Mealey BL
    J Periodontol; 2007 Dec; 78(12):2238-45. PubMed ID: 18052694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of fluorescence-controlled Er:YAG laser radiation, the Vector system and hand instruments on periodontally diseased root surfaces in vivo.
    Schwarz F; Bieling K; Venghaus S; Sculean A; Jepsen S; Becker J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Mar; 33(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 16489946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Distribution of different morphologic types of subgingival calculus on proximal root surfaces.
    Gürgan CA; Bilgin E
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Mar; 36(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 15887506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing: single versus multiple episodes of instrumentation.
    Anderson GB; Palmer JA; Bye FL; Smith BA; Caffesse RG
    J Periodontol; 1996 Apr; 67(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 8708961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro performance of DIAGNOdent laser fluorescence device for dental calculus detection on human tooth root surfaces.
    Rams TE; Alwaqyan AY
    Saudi Dent J; 2017 Oct; 29(4):171-178. PubMed ID: 29033528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laser fluorescence detection of subgingival calculus using the DIAGNOdent Classic versus periodontal probing.
    Shakibaie F; Walsh LJ
    Lasers Med Sci; 2016 Nov; 31(8):1621-1626. PubMed ID: 27435218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Ultrasonic instrumentation versus hand instrumentation in periodontics. A review of the literature].
    Deblauwe BM; van der Weijden GA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Jul; 99(7):239-44. PubMed ID: 11819997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing: an evaluation of therapy with and without the use of the periodontal endoscope.
    Geisinger ML; Mealey BL; Schoolfield J; Mellonig JT
    J Periodontol; 2007 Jan; 78(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 17199535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
    Drisko CH
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The clinical effectiveness of open versus closed scaling and root planing on multi-rooted teeth.
    Wylam JM; Mealey BL; Mills MP; Waldrop TC; Moskowicz DC
    J Periodontol; 1993 Nov; 64(11):1023-8. PubMed ID: 8295086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.