777 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16018773)
1. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Wong CK; Wong YH; Lo LS; Tai CM; Ng TK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16018773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.
Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost analysis of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for early endometrial cancer.
Scribner DR; Mannel RS; Walker JL; Johnson GA
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):460-3. PubMed ID: 10600307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?
Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stages I and II endometrial cancer. Operating data, follow up and survival.
Zapico A; Fuentes P; Grassa A; Arnanz F; Otazua J; Cortés-Prieto J
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Aug; 98(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15982724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: analysis of the first 100 cases.
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 11520146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of survival after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with the conventional abdominal approach for early-stage endometrial carcinoma: a review of the literature.
Gil-Moreno A; Díaz-Feijoo B; Morchón S; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 16431320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical analysis of radical hysterectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy for patients with malignant uterine tumors: laparoscopy versus laparotomy].
He YL; Zhang LY; Yang J; Pan SL; Peng DX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 May; 39(5):308-10. PubMed ID: 15196411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in clinical stage I endometrial cancer: safety, recurrence, and long-term outcome.
Kalogiannidis I; Lambrechts S; Amant F; Neven P; Van Gorp T; Vergote I
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 196(3):248.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17346541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing surgical outcomes in obese women undergoing laparotomy, laparoscopy, or laparotomy with panniculectomy for the staging of uterine malignancy.
Eisenhauer EL; Wypych KA; Mehrara BJ; Lawson C; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):2384-91. PubMed ID: 17522943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy more efficient in operative treatment of endometrial cancer?
Barwijuk A; Jankowska S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Oct; 25(7):703-5. PubMed ID: 16263547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of different approaches in surgical management of early endometrial cancer].
Bats AS; Chatellier G; Clément D; Larousserie F; Lefrère-Belda MA; Lecuru F; Nos C
Bull Cancer; 2007 Nov; 94(11):1003-7. PubMed ID: 18055318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal vs. abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer stage 1.
Tollund L; Hansen B; Kjer JJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(9):1138-41. PubMed ID: 16929423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy.
Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):360.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18928974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative analysis of laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy for early stage endometrial cancer].
Peng P; Huang HF; Shen K; Pan LY; Wu M; Yang JX; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 39(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 15130375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution.
Jung YW; Lee DW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim JH; Kim JW; Kim YT
J Surg Oncol; 2010 Feb; 101(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 19902479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer compared with laparotomy.
Terai Y; Tanaka T; Sasaki H; Kawaguchi H; Fujiwara S; Yoo S; Tanaka Y; Tsunetoh S; Kanemura M; Ohmichi M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Feb; 40(2):570-5. PubMed ID: 24118459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
