372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16019630)
1. Reliability and validity of useful field of view test scores as administered by personal computer.
Edwards JD; Vance DE; Wadley VG; Cissell GM; Roenker DL; Ball KK
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Jul; 27(5):529-43. PubMed ID: 16019630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of driver distraction and low alcohol concentrations on useful field of view and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
Puell MC; Barrio A
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):634-41. PubMed ID: 18081908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The useful field of view test: normative data for older adults.
Edwards JD; Ross LA; Wadley VG; Clay OJ; Crowe M; Roenker DL; Ball KK
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 May; 21(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 16704918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Useful field of view predicts driving in the presence of distracters.
Wood JM; Chaparro A; Lacherez P; Hickson L
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Apr; 89(4):373-81. PubMed ID: 22366710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relation of useful field of view and other screening tests to on-road driving performance.
Myers RS; Ball KK; Kalina TD; Roth DL; Goode KT
Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):279-90. PubMed ID: 11011899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Divided visual attention as a predictor of bumping while walking: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation.
Broman AT; West SK; Muñoz B; Bandeen-Roche K; Rubin GS; Turano KA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):2955-60. PubMed ID: 15326107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers.
Ball K; Owsley C; Sloane ME; Roenker DL; Bruni JR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Oct; 34(11):3110-23. PubMed ID: 8407219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of visual attention in predicting driving impairment in older adults.
Hoffman L; McDowd JM; Atchley P; Dubinsky R
Psychol Aging; 2005 Dec; 20(4):610-22. PubMed ID: 16420136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. UFOV performance and driving ability following traumatic brain injury.
Novack TA; Baños JH; Alderson AL; Schneider JJ; Weed W; Blankenship J; Salisbury D
Brain Inj; 2006 May; 20(5):455-61. PubMed ID: 16716991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and assessment of a neuropsychological battery to aid in predicting driving performance.
Szlyk JP; Myers L; Zhang Y; Wetzel L; Shapiro R
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(4):483-96. PubMed ID: 17638145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].
Bralet MC; Navarre M; Eskenazi AM; Lucas-Ross M; Falissard B
Encephale; 2008 Dec; 34(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 19081451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity, reliability, and repeatability of the useful field of view test in persons with normal vision and patients with glaucoma.
Bentley SA; LeBlanc RP; Nicolela MT; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):6763-9. PubMed ID: 22956614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of the MATRICS and IntegNeuro cognitive assessment batteries.
Silverstein SM; Jaeger J; Donovan-Lepore AM; Wilkniss SM; Savitz A; Malinovsky I; Hawthorne D; Raines S; Carson S; Marcello S; Zukin SR; Furlong S; Dent G
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2010 Nov; 32(9):937-52. PubMed ID: 20455131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chronological age and age-related cognitive deficits are associated with an increase in multiple types of driving errors in late life.
Anstey KJ; Wood J
Neuropsychology; 2011 Sep; 25(5):613-21. PubMed ID: 21574713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The useful field of view test, normative data in children of school age.
Bennett DM; Gordon G; Dutton GN
Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 86(6):717-21. PubMed ID: 19417701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Useful field of view as a reliable screening measure of driving performance in people with Parkinson's disease: results of a pilot study.
Classen S; McCarthy DP; Shechtman O; Awadzi KD; Lanford DN; Okun MS; Rodriguez RL; Romrell J; Bridges S; Kluger B; Fernandez HH
Traffic Inj Prev; 2009 Dec; 10(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 19916131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing visual fields for driving in patients with paracentral scotomata.
Chisholm CM; Rauscher FG; Crabb DC; Davies LN; Dunne MC; Edgar DF; Harlow JA; James-Galton M; Petzold A; Plant GT; Viswanathan AC; Underwood GJ; Barbur JL
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 17962396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acceptability and concurrent validity of measures to predict older driver involvement in motor vehicle crashes: an Emergency Department pilot case-control study.
Molnar FJ; Marshall SC; Man-Son-Hing M; Wilson KG; Byszewski AM; Stiell I
Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Sep; 39(5):1056-63. PubMed ID: 17854579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying at-risk older adult community-dwelling drivers through neuropsychological evaluation.
Zook NA; Bennett TL; Lane M
Appl Neuropsychol; 2009 Oct; 16(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 20183183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the hazard perception ability of matched groups of healthy drivers aged 35 to 55, 65 to 74, and 75 to 84 years.
Horswill MS; Pachana NA; Wood J; Marrington SA; McWilliam J; McCullough CM
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):799-802. PubMed ID: 19570309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
