359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16019870)
1. Effectiveness of an affordable hearing aid with elderly persons.
McPherson B; Wong ET
Disabil Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 27(11):601-9. PubMed ID: 16019870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the active communication education program for older people with hearing impairment.
Hickson L; Worrall L; Scarinci N
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):212-30. PubMed ID: 17496672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
Saunders GH; Forsline A
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of high-frequency amplification on the objective and subjective performance of hearing instrument users with varying degrees of high-frequency hearing loss.
Plyler PN; Fleck EL
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Jun; 49(3):616-27. PubMed ID: 16787899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of satisfaction measures of analog and digital hearing aid users.
Magni C; Freiberger F; Tonn K
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2005; 71(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 16612528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of hearing aid outcome in the elderly: comparison between young and old elderly.
Chang WH; Tseng HC; Chao TK; Hsu CJ; Liu TC
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jun; 138(6):730-4. PubMed ID: 18503844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What makes adults with hearing impairment take up hearing AIDS or communication programs and achieve successful outcomes?
Laplante-Lévesque A; Hickson L; Worrall L
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 21841487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do experienced hearing aid users know how to use their hearing AIDS correctly?
Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
Am J Audiol; 2009 Jun; 18(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 19380509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors associated with hearing aid fitting outcomes on the IOI-HA.
Hickson L; Clutterbuck S; Khan A
Int J Audiol; 2010 Aug; 49(8):586-95. PubMed ID: 20515423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
Fraysse B; Dillier N; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Morera Perez C; Morgon AH; Müller-Deile J; Ramos Macias A
Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
Narendran MM; Humes LE
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant.
Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Witt SA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):668-80. PubMed ID: 16197280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective and subjective hearing aid assessment outcomes.
Mendel LL
Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):118-29. PubMed ID: 18056880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Verification of improved patient outcomes with a partially implantable hearing aid, The SOUNDTEC direct hearing system.
Roland PS; Shoup AG; Shea MC; Richey HS; Jones DB
Laryngoscope; 2001 Oct; 111(10):1682-6. PubMed ID: 11801925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
