BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16019880)

  • 1. Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models.
    Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 16019880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low-cost oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure monitors: device repeatability and device differences.
    Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Aug; 26(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 15886439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?
    Amoore JN; Scott DH
    Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 10828894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extracting oscillometric pulses from the cuff pressure: does it affect the pressures determined by oscillometric blood pressure monitors?
    Amoore JN
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 16932036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
    Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors influencing the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients.
    Bur A; Herkner H; Vlcek M; Woisetschläger C; Derhaschnig U; Delle Karth G; Laggner AN; Hirschl MM
    Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3):793-9. PubMed ID: 12626986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simulation study of the consistency of oscillometric blood pressure measurements with and without artefacts.
    Amoore JN
    Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 10828893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Devices for blood pressure self measurement: tested in comparison.
    Anlauf M; Tholl U; Högermeyer D; Hirche H; Roggenbuck U; Simonides R
    Z Kardiol; 1996; 85 Suppl 3():20-5. PubMed ID: 8896295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Algorithms for converting random-zero to automated oscillometric blood pressure values, and vice versa.
    Stang A; Moebus S; Möhlenkamp S; Dragano N; Schmermund A; Beck EM; Siegrist J; Erbel R; Jöckel KH;
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 164(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 16675536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
    Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
    Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings.
    de Greeff A; Nathan H; Stafford N; Liu B; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 19020425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of the Artsana CSI 610 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    Pini C; Pastori M; Baccheschi J; Omboni S; Parati G;
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 17496468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oscillometric blood pressure measurements: differences between measured and calculated mean arterial pressure.
    Kiers HD; Hofstra JM; Wetzels JF
    Neth J Med; 2008 Dec; 66(11):474-9. PubMed ID: 19075313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An optical oscillometric method for neonatal and premature infant blood pressure monitoring.
    Roeder RA; Geddes LA
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Apr; 9(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19363328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-invasive determination of instantaneous brachial blood flow using the oscillometric method.
    Liu SH; Wang JJ; Cheng DC
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Aug; 54(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 19807282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.