These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16020377)

  • 1. ROCs in recognition with and without identification.
    Cleary AM
    Memory; 2005 Jul; 13(5):472-83. PubMed ID: 16020377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection.
    Yonelinas AP; Dobbins I; Szymanski MD; Dhaliwal HS; King L
    Conscious Cogn; 1996 Dec; 5(4):418-41. PubMed ID: 9063609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: comment on Yonelinas (1999).
    Qin J; Raye CL; Johnson MK; Mitchell KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jul; 27(4):1110-5. PubMed ID: 11486922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review.
    Yonelinas AP; Parks CM
    Psychol Bull; 2007 Sep; 133(5):800-32. PubMed ID: 17723031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Remember" source memory ROCs indicate recollection is a continuous process.
    Slotnick SD
    Memory; 2010 Jan; 18(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 19937493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory.
    Wixted JT
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jan; 114(1):152-76. PubMed ID: 17227185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Category length produces an inverted-U discriminability function in episodic recognition memory.
    Neely JH; Tse CS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1141-72. PubMed ID: 19048453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binary ROCs in perception and recognition memory are curved.
    Dube C; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):130-51. PubMed ID: 21859236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic.
    Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1210-30. PubMed ID: 14622056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classification and recognition in artificial grammar learning: Analysis of receiver operating characteristics.
    Lotz A; Kinder A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):667-82. PubMed ID: 16707356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognition ROCs are curvilinear-or are they? On premature arguments against the two-high-threshold model of recognition.
    Bröder A; Schütz J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):587-606. PubMed ID: 19379038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the nature of associative information in recognition memory.
    Kelley R; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):701-22. PubMed ID: 11394675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity.
    Yonelinas AP
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):747-63. PubMed ID: 9421560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective disruption of hippocampus-mediated recognition memory processes after episodes of transient global amnesia.
    Jäger T; Szabo K; Griebe M; Bäzner H; Möller J; Hennerici MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 18789957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition.
    Dodd MD; Sheard ED; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 16423748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing a neurocomputational model of recollection, familiarity, and source recognition.
    Elfman KW; Parks CM; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):752-68. PubMed ID: 18605866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Context, remember-know recognition judgements, and ROC parameters.
    Algarabel S; Pitarque A
    Memory; 2007 Jul; 15(5):477-94. PubMed ID: 17613792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule.
    Starns JJ; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognition memory for faces: when familiarity supports associative recognition judgments.
    Yonelinas AP; Kroll NE; Dobbins IG; Soltani M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Dec; 6(4):654-61. PubMed ID: 10682209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Separating mnemonic process from participant and item effects in the assessment of ROC asymmetries.
    Pratte MS; Rouder JN; Morey RD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):224-32. PubMed ID: 20053058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.