These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16020379)

  • 1. Study repetition and the rejection of conjunction lures.
    Jones TC
    Memory; 2005 Jul; 13(5):499-515. PubMed ID: 16020379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Editing (out) generated study words in a recognition exclusion task: Effects of response signal delay and generation procedure.
    Jones TC
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):712-29. PubMed ID: 16829488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conjunction errors in recognition memory: modality-free errors for older adults but not for young adults.
    Jones TC; Jacoby LL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Sep; 120(1):55-73. PubMed ID: 15876419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phantom ROC: Recollection rejection in a hybrid conjoint recognition signal detection model.
    Lampinen JM; Watkins KN; Odegard TN
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):655-71. PubMed ID: 16829485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conjunction error rates on a continuous recognition memory test: little evidence for recollection.
    Jones TC; Atchley P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Mar; 28(2):374-9. PubMed ID: 11911393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memory conjunction errors: the effects of presentation duration and study repetition.
    Leding JK; Lampinen JM
    Memory; 2009 Jul; 17(5):597-607. PubMed ID: 19548174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule.
    Starns JJ; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall.
    McCabe DP; Smith AD
    Memory; 2006 Jul; 14(5):570-83. PubMed ID: 16754242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust recollection rejection in the memory conjunction paradigm.
    Lampinen JM; Odegard TN; Neuschatz JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):332-42. PubMed ID: 14979808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The difference between implicit and explicit associative processes at study in creating false memory in the DRM paradigm.
    Kawasaki Y; Yama H
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 16423743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conjunction errors, recollection-based rejections, and forgetting in a continuous recognition task.
    Jones TC; Atchley P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 16478341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A decrease in conjunction error rates across lags on a continuous recognition task: a robust pattern.
    Jones TC; Atchley P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1726-40. PubMed ID: 18942037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.
    Higham PA; Perfect TJ; Bruno D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 19210081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conscious control and memory awareness when recognising famous faces.
    Konstantinou I; Gardiner JM
    Memory; 2005 Jul; 13(5):449-57. PubMed ID: 16020375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Process demands of rejection mechanisms of recognition memory.
    Odegard TN; Koen JD; Gama JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1296-304. PubMed ID: 18763906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Context-dependent repetition effects on recognition memory.
    Opitz B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Jul; 73(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 20493623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in brain electrical activity during extended continuous word recognition.
    Van Strien JW; Hagenbeek RE; Stam CJ; Rombouts SA; Barkhof F
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):952-9. PubMed ID: 15955505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of recollection and familiarity in childhood and adolescence: evidence from the dual-process signal detection model.
    Ghetti S; Angelini L
    Child Dev; 2008; 79(2):339-58. PubMed ID: 18366427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Situation models and retrieval interference: pictures and words.
    Radvansky GA; Copeland DE
    Memory; 2006 Jul; 14(5):614-23. PubMed ID: 16754245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two types of recollection-based monitoring in younger and older adults: Recall-to-reject and the distinctiveness heuristic.
    Gallo DA; Bell DM; Beier JS; Schacter DL
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):730-41. PubMed ID: 16829489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.