495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16020589)
1. Mid term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves.
Florath I; Albert A; Rosendahl U; Alexander T; Ennker IC; Ennker J
Heart; 2005 Aug; 91(8):1023-9. PubMed ID: 16020589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The stentless freestyle bioprosthesis: impact of age over 80 years on quality of life, perioperative, and mid-term outcome.
Ennker J; Dalladaku F; Rosendahl U; Ennker IC; Mauser M; Florath I
J Card Surg; 2006; 21(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16846417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses.
Brown ML; Schaff HV; Lahr BD; Mullany CJ; Sundt TM; Dearani JA; McGregor CG; Orszulak TA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):878-84; discussion 884. PubMed ID: 18374773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stentless aortic valve reoperations: a surgical challenge.
Borger MA; Prasongsukarn K; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; David TE
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Sep; 84(3):737-43; discussion 743-4. PubMed ID: 17720369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Midterm outcome after aortic root replacement with stentless porcine bioprostheses.
Ennker IC; Albert A; Dalladaku F; Rosendahl U; Ennker J; Florath I
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 21277220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Risk of perioperative mortality and complications following biological aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: stented vs. unstented prostheses].
Ennker J; Florath I; Rosendahl U; Bauer S; von Hodenberg E; Ennker IC
Z Kardiol; 2001; 90 Suppl 6():58-64. PubMed ID: 11826823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term outcome after biologic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in 841 patients.
Peterseim DS; Cen YY; Cheruvu S; Landolfo K; Bashore TM; Lowe JE; Wolfe WG; Glower DD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 May; 117(5):890-7. PubMed ID: 10220680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Midterm results after aortic valve replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis aortic valve.
Martinovic I; Everlien M; Farah I; Wittlinger T; Knez I; Greve H; Vogt P
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jul; 80(1):198-203. PubMed ID: 15975367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is routine use of stentless aortic prostheses justified in an elderly (aged > or =75 years) population?
Ali A; Kumar P; Athanasiou T; Halstead J; Ashrafian H; Ali Z; Kumar S; Theodorou P; Pepper JR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):64-70; discussion 70-1. PubMed ID: 15700438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement.
Khan SS; Trento A; DeRobertis M; Kass RM; Sandhu M; Czer LS; Blanche C; Raissi S; Fontana GP; Cheng W; Chaux A; Matloff JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless prosthesis: 7 years' experience in 130 patients.
D'Onofrio A; Auriemma S; Magagna P; Favaro A; Cannarella A; Piccin C; Bilotta M; Abbiate N; Lamascese N; Fabbri A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 134(2):491-5. PubMed ID: 17662795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term safety and effectiveness of mechanical versus biologic aortic valve prostheses in older patients: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery National Database.
Brennan JM; Edwards FH; Zhao Y; O'Brien S; Booth ME; Dokholyan RS; Douglas PS; Peterson ED;
Circulation; 2013 Apr; 127(16):1647-55. PubMed ID: 23538379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stentless bioprostheses in small aortic roots: impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on survival and quality of life.
Ennker J; Rosendahl U; Albert A; Dumlu E; Ennker IC; Florath I
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 16116880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients.
McClure RS; Narayanasamy N; Wiegerinck E; Lipsitz S; Maloney A; Byrne JG; Aranki SF; Couper GS; Cohn LH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1410-6. PubMed ID: 20417753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis for aortic valve therapy: 17-year clinical results.
Ennker J; Meilwes M; Pons-Kuehnemann J; Niemann B; Grieshaber P; Ennker IC; Boening A
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2016 Nov; 24(9):868-874. PubMed ID: 27926465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless valve: five-year follow up.
Nyawo B; Graham R; Hunter S
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Jan; 16(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17315382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single-center outcome analysis of 1,161 patients with St. Jude medical and ATS open pivot mechanical heart valves.
Bernet FH; Baykut D; Grize L; Zerkowski HR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Mar; 16(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 17484464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thrombocytopenia after aortic valve replacement: comparison between mechanical and biological valves.
van Straten AH; Hamad MA; Berreklouw E; ter Woorst JF; Martens EJ; Tan ME
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 20583405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
