254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16021377)
21. Totally minimally invasive robot-assisted unstented pyeloplasty using the Zeus Microwrist Surgical System: an animal study.
Lorincz A; Knight CG; Kant AJ; Langenburg SE; Rabah R; Gidell K; Dawe E; Klein MD; McLorie G
J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Feb; 40(2):418-22. PubMed ID: 15750940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How does the surgeon's experience of abdominal operations influence the learning curves for robot-assisted vascular anastomosis?
Soga S; Watanabe G; Ishikawa N; Kimura K; Oda M
Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 24356433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Total laparoscopically and robotically assisted aortic aneurysm surgery: a critical evaluation.
Kolvenbach R; Schwierz E; Wasilljew S; Miloud A; Puerschel A; Pinter L
J Vasc Surg; 2004 Apr; 39(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 15071439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of a novel modified suture material designed to facilitate intracorporeal knot tying during laparoscopic surgery.
Tan A; Razvi H
J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1104-8. PubMed ID: 16283848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Tying and Tearing in Robotic and Laparoscopic Intracorporeally Hand-Sewn Ileocolic Anastomoses. A Propensity Score-Matched Prospective Study.
Gachabayov M; Angelos G; Bergamaschi R
Surg Technol Int; 2019 May; 34():163-168. PubMed ID: 30574680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robotic suturing on the FLS model possesses construct validity, is less physically demanding, and is favored by more surgeons compared with laparoscopy.
Stefanidis D; Hope WW; Scott DJ
Surg Endosc; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2141-6. PubMed ID: 21184110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preliminary study of virtual reality and model simulation for learning laparoscopic suturing skills.
McDougall EM; Kolla SB; Santos RT; Gan JM; Box GN; Louie MK; Gamboa AJ; Kaplan AG; Moskowitz RM; Andrade LA; Skarecky DW; Osann KE; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):1018-25. PubMed ID: 19616797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Ahlering TE; Skarecky D; Lee D; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1738-41. PubMed ID: 14532766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms.
Nguan C; Kwan K; Al Omar M; Beasley KA; Luke PP
Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3571-6. PubMed ID: 17594748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Technical assessment of porcine enteroenterostomy performed with ZEUS robotic technology.
Hollands CM; Dixey LN; Torma MJ
J Pediatr Surg; 2001 Aug; 36(8):1231-3. PubMed ID: 11479863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robotic suturing: technique and benefit in advanced laparoscopic surgery.
Kenngott HG; Muller-Stich BP; Reiter MA; Rassweiler J; Gutt CN
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2008; 17(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 18609002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sequential learning of psychomotor and visuospatial skills for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying-a randomized controlled trial "The Shoebox Study" DRKS00008668.
Nickel F; Hendrie JD; Kowalewski KF; Bruckner T; Garrow CR; Mantel M; Kenngott HG; Romero P; Fischer L; Müller-Stich BP
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2016 Sep; 401(6):893-901. PubMed ID: 27055853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.
Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The efficacy of robotic driven handheld instruments for the acquisition of basic laparoscopic suturing skills.
Zapardiel I; Hernandez A; De Santiago J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():106-9. PubMed ID: 25668135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computer-assisted, robot-enhanced open microsurgery in an animal model.
Knight CG; Lorincz A; Cao A; Gidell K; Klein MD; Langenburg SE
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2005 Apr; 15(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 15898914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic suturing and knot tying: a comparison of standard techniques to a mechanical assist device.
Bermas H; Fenoglio M; Haun W; Moore JT
JSLS; 2004; 8(2):187-9. PubMed ID: 15119668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.
Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Robotic surgery and resident training.
De Ugarte DA; Etzioni DA; Gracia C; Atkinson JB
Surg Endosc; 2003 Jun; 17(6):960-3. PubMed ID: 12658424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robotically assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis in a porcine model: a pilot study.
Margossian H; Garcia-Ruiz A; Falcone T; Goldberg JM; Attaran M; Miller JH; Gagner M
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 1998 Apr; 8(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 9617965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic skill acquisition: implications for training.
Obek C; Hubka M; Porter M; Chang L; Porter JR
J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1098-103. PubMed ID: 16283847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
