288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16021597)
1. Are AM1 ligand-protein binding enthalpies good enough for use in the rational design of new drugs?
Villar R; Gil MJ; García JI; Martínez-Merino V
J Comput Chem; 2005 Oct; 26(13):1347-58. PubMed ID: 16021597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protein-ligand interaction energies with dispersion corrected density functional theory and high-level wave function based methods.
Antony J; Grimme S; Liakos DG; Neese F
J Phys Chem A; 2011 Oct; 115(41):11210-20. PubMed ID: 21842894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) study using semiempirical, density functional, ab initio methods and pharmacophore derivation using DISCOtech on sigma 1 ligands.
Jung D; Floyd J; Gund TM
J Comput Chem; 2004 Aug; 25(11):1385-99. PubMed ID: 15185333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Structures and energies of D-galactose and galabiose conformers as calculated by ab initio and semiempirical methods.
Rahal-Sekkal M; Sekkal N; Kleb DC; Bleckmann P
J Comput Chem; 2003 May; 24(7):806-18. PubMed ID: 12692790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SuperStar: improved knowledge-based interaction fields for protein binding sites.
Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Watson P; Gillet V; Willett P
J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(3):841-59. PubMed ID: 11273705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ab initio quantum mechanical study of the binding energies of human estrogen receptor alpha with its ligands: an application of fragment molecular orbital method.
Fukuzawa K; Kitaura K; Uebayasi M; Nakata K; Kaminuma T; Nakano T
J Comput Chem; 2005 Jan; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15521089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ab initio study of hydrogen-bond formation between aliphatic and phenolic hydroxy groups and selected amino acid side chains.
Nagy PI; Erhardt PW
J Phys Chem A; 2008 May; 112(18):4342-54. PubMed ID: 18373368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The structure and binding energies of the van der Waals complexes of Ar and N2 with phenol and its cation, studied by high level ab initio and density functional theory calculations.
Vincent MA; Hillier IH; Morgado CA; Burton NA; Shan X
J Chem Phys; 2008 Jan; 128(4):044313. PubMed ID: 18247955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fluorine bonding--how does it work in protein-ligand interactions?
Zhou P; Zou J; Tian F; Shang Z
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2344-55. PubMed ID: 19788294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy.
Erickson JA; Jalaie M; Robertson DH; Lewis RA; Vieth M
J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 14695819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aromatic interactions in the binding of ligands to HMGCoA reductase.
Kee EA; Livengood MC; Carter EE; McKenna M; Cafiero M
J Phys Chem B; 2009 Nov; 113(44):14810-5. PubMed ID: 19863142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PM3-compatible zinc parameters optimized for metalloenzyme active sites.
Brothers EN; Suarez D; Deerfield DW; Merz KM
J Comput Chem; 2004 Nov; 25(14):1677-92. PubMed ID: 15362125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semi-empirical molecular orbital methods including dispersion corrections for the accurate prediction of the full range of intermolecular interactions in biomolecules.
McNamara JP; Hillier IH
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2007 May; 9(19):2362-70. PubMed ID: 17492099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ab initio study of hydrogen-bond formation between cyclic ethers and selected amino acid side chains.
Nagy PI; Erhardt PW
J Phys Chem A; 2006 Dec; 110(51):13923-32. PubMed ID: 17181352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting activation enthalpies of cytochrome-P450-mediated hydrogen abstractions. 2. Comparison of semiempirical PM3, SAM1, and AM1 with a density functional theory method.
Mayeno AN; Robinson JL; Yang RS; Reisfeld B
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1692-703. PubMed ID: 19522482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How dependent are molecular and atomic properties on the electronic structure method? Comparison of Hartree-Fock, DFT, and MP2 on a biologically relevant set of molecules.
Matta CF
J Comput Chem; 2010 Apr; 31(6):1297-311. PubMed ID: 19882732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. QM methods in structure based design: utility in probing protein-ligand interactions.
Gleeson MP; Hannongbua S; Gleeson D
J Mol Graph Model; 2010 Dec; 29(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 21075029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semiempirical PM5 molecular orbital study on chlorophylls and bacteriochlorophylls: comparison of semiempirical, ab initio, and density functional results.
Linnanto J; Korppi-Tommola J
J Comput Chem; 2004 Jan; 25(1):123-38. PubMed ID: 14635000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new force field (ECEPP-05) for peptides, proteins, and organic molecules.
Arnautova YA; Jagielska A; Scheraga HA
J Phys Chem B; 2006 Mar; 110(10):5025-44. PubMed ID: 16526746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mapping the energetics of water-protein and water-ligand interactions with the "natural" HINT forcefield: predictive tools for characterizing the roles of water in biomolecules.
Amadasi A; Spyrakis F; Cozzini P; Abraham DJ; Kellogg GE; Mozzarelli A
J Mol Biol; 2006 Apr; 358(1):289-309. PubMed ID: 16497327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
