These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16021793)

  • 1. Cooperative research ethics review boards: a win-win solution?
    Koski G; Aungst J; Kupersmith J; Getz K; Rimoin D
    IRB; 2005; 27(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 16021793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternatives to local institutional review board (IRB) system debated.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Apr; 21(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 16832918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing the burden on many institutional review boards.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 15119341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research ethics boards: size, not money.
    Hill J
    PLoS Med; 2006 Oct; 3(10):e457; author reply e460, e471. PubMed ID: 17076570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The need to understand IRB deliberations.
    Candilis PJ; Lidz CW; Arnold RM
    IRB; 2006; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16680872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethics committees in Asia.
    de Castro LD
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):120-2. PubMed ID: 15282929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethics committee approval of multicentre studies.
    MacDonald A
    Intern Med J; 2005 May; 35(5):311-2; author reply 312. PubMed ID: 15845120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New guidance on reviews by central institutional review boards (IRBs).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 May; 20(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 16175714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IRBs and continuing review: regulatory interference or vital safeguard?
    McBride LC; Yessian MR
    Food Drug Cosmet Med Device Law Dig; 1999 Mar; 16(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 12784812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SACHRP recommendations for review of children's research requiring DHHS secretary's approval.
    Fisher CB; Kornetsky SZ
    IRB; 2005; 27(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 16021795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New Zealand's ethics committees.
    Moore A
    N Z Bioeth J; 2004 Jun; 5(2):3. PubMed ID: 15597495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethics review of multi-centre clinical trials in Canada.
    Enzle ME; Schmaltz R
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):51-7. PubMed ID: 16459414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethical decision making in committee: the role of review boards and ethics committees in health care, health policy, and medical research.
    Sass HM
    Taiwan Yi Xue Ren Wen Xue Kan; 2000 Nov; 1(1):8-26. PubMed ID: 15008173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards.
    Saver RS
    William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Nov; 46(2):619-730. PubMed ID: 17167924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research, ethics committees and legal issues.
    Moore A
    N Z Bioeth J; 2003 Oct; 4(3):8-15. PubMed ID: 15597476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reforming the oversight of multi-site clinical research: a review of two possible solutions.
    Nowak KS; Bankert EA; Nelson RM
    Account Res; 2006; 13(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 16770857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple competing interests surround ethical review of clinical trials.
    Henderson D
    Intern Med J; 2005 Nov; 35(11):686-7. PubMed ID: 16248869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Notes from the field: jumpstarting the IRB approval process in multicenter studies.
    Blustein J; Regenstein M; Siegel B; Billings J
    Health Serv Res; 2007 Aug; 42(4):1773-82. PubMed ID: 17610447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Canadian research ethics boards and multisite research: experiences from two minimal-risk studies.
    Racine E; Bell E; Deslauriers C
    IRB; 2010; 32(3):12-8. PubMed ID: 20590052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Ethics of observational studies: are specific rules useful?].
    Rosmini F
    Epidemiol Prev; 2006; 30(4-5):295-7. PubMed ID: 17176945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.