BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16022040)

  • 41. Antimicrobial capacity of Aloe vera and propolis dentifrice against Streptococcus mutans strains in toothbrushes: an in vitro study.
    Bertolini PF; Biondi Filho O; Pomilio A; Pinheiro SL; Carvalho MS
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2012 Feb; 20(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 22437675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. How clean is the toothbrush that cleans your tooth?
    Ankola AV; Hebbal M; Eshwar S
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2009 Nov; 7(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 19832908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Toothbrush filaments end-rounding: stereomicroscope analysis.
    Checchi L; Minguzzi S; Franchi M; Forteleoni G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Apr; 28(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 11314893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of triclosan dentifrice on toothbrush contamination.
    Nelson-Filho P; Isper AR; Assed S; Faria G; Ito IY
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 15080352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A microbiological assessment of the oral hygiene of 24-72-month-old kindergarten children and disinfection of their toothbrushes.
    Celepkolu T; Toptancı IR; Bucaktepe PG; Sen V; Dogan MS; Kars V; Aslanhan H; Aslan I; Dal T; Yıldız I; Palancı Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Aug; 14():94. PubMed ID: 25085407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Is a new sonic toothbrush more effective in plaque removal than a manual toothbrush?
    Re D; Augusti G; Battaglia D; Giannì AB; Augusti D
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 25793947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of toothbrush disinfection via different methods.
    Basman A; Peker I; Akca G; Alkurt MT; Sarikir C; Celik I
    Braz Oral Res; 2016; 30():. PubMed ID: 26676193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Mutans streptococci remained viable on toothbrush bristles, in vivo, for 44 h.
    Assed Bezerra Da Silva L; Nelson-Filho P; Saravia ME; De Rossi A; Lucisano MP; Assed Bezerra Da Silva R
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Sep; 24(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 25247225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Studies on bacterial contamination of chlorhexidine coated filaments of the toothbrush].
    Yokosuka N; Tanaka T; Ebisudani K; Iwai T
    Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi; 1989 Sep; 31(3):960-9. PubMed ID: 2489542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of the plaque removal efficacy of three power toothbrushes.
    Sharma NC; Lyle DM; Qaqish JG; Galustians J
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 8(3):83-8. PubMed ID: 16865997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A comparative study of two powered toothbrushes and one manual toothbrush in young adults.
    McCracken GI; Stacey F; Heasman L; Sellers P; Macgregor ID; Kelly PJ; Heasman PA
    J Clin Dent; 2001; 12(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 11475711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clinical efficacy of Colgate 360 degrees and three commercially available toothbrushes on the removal of desquamated epithelial cells.
    Williams MI; Vazquez J; Cummins D
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2004 Oct; 25(10 Suppl 2):12-6. PubMed ID: 15789977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A novel approach to controlling bacterial contamination on toothbrushes: chlorhexidine coating.
    Turner LA; McCombs GB; Hynes WL; Tolle SL
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2009 Nov; 7(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 19832909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.
    Cugini M; Thompson M; Warren PR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):1-9. PubMed ID: 17091134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effects of load and toothpaste on powered toothbrush vibrations.
    Lea SC; Khan A; Patanwala HS; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Dent; 2007 Apr; 35(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 17196730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Clinical evaluation of the plaque-removing ability of three different toothbrushes in a mentally disabled group.
    Doğan MC; Alaçam A; Aşici N; Odabaş M; Seydaoğlu G
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Dec; 62(6):350-4. PubMed ID: 15848980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Tooth cleaning with different children's toothbrushes. A clinical study].
    Scheidegger N; Lussi A
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2005; 115(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 15771333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of tapered-end toothbrushes regarding subgingival access efficacy.
    Hotta M; Yoshida T; Sekine I; Imada S; Sano A
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(6):156-8. PubMed ID: 9586531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparative plaque removal efficacy of two new powered toothbrushes and a manual toothbrush.
    Ghassemi A; Vorwerk L; Hooper W; Patel V; Milleman JL; Milleman KR
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 25122975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. One- and 3-minute plaque removal by a battery-powered versus a manual toothbrush.
    Williams K; Ferrante A; Dockter K; Haun J; Biesbrock AR; Bartizek RD
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1107-13. PubMed ID: 15455739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.