200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1602227)
1. Lexical and nonlexical routes: a comparison between normally achieving and poor readers.
Beech JR; Awaida M
J Learn Disabil; 1992 Mar; 25(3):196-206. PubMed ID: 1602227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is a "Phoenician" reading style superior to a "Chinese" reading style? Evidence from fourth graders.
Bowey JA
J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 Jul; 100(3):186-214. PubMed ID: 18054365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual and phonological processing of words: a comparison of good and poor readers.
Foorman BR; Liberman D
J Learn Disabil; 1989; 22(6):349-55. PubMed ID: 2738468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A reading-level design study of phonological skills underlying fourth-grade children's word reading difficulties.
Bowey JA; Cain MT; Ryan SM
Child Dev; 1992 Aug; 63(4):999-1011. PubMed ID: 1505252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phonemic feature involvement in lexical access in grades 3 and 5: Evidence from visual and auditory lexical decision tasks.
Sauval K; Perre L; Casalis S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jan; 182():212-219. PubMed ID: 29258652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semantic and phonological coding in poor and normal readers.
Vellutino FR; Scanlon DM; Spearing D
J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Feb; 59(1):76-123. PubMed ID: 7876770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory temporal processing and lexical/nonlexical reading in developmental dyslexics.
Cestnick L; Jerger J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Oct; 11(9):501-13. PubMed ID: 11057735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phonological processing in reading Chinese among normally achieving and poor readers.
Chan CK; Siegel LS
J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 Sep; 80(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 11511133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating current deficit theories of poor reading: role of phonological processing, naming speed, balance automaticity, rapid verbal perception and working memory.
Savage R; Frederickson N; Goodwin R; Patni U; Smith N; Tuersley L
Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Oct; 101(2):345-61. PubMed ID: 16383062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface and phonological developmental dyslexia in Greek.
Douklias SD; Masterson J; Hanley JR
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 Dec; 26(8):705-23. PubMed ID: 20407965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wots that werd? Pseudowords (non-words) may be a misleading measure of phonological skills in young learner readers.
Thomson B; Crewther DP; Crewther SG
Dyslexia; 2006 Nov; 12(4):289-99. PubMed ID: 17152344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Eliciting dyslexic symptoms in proficient readers by simulating deficits in grapheme-to-phoneme conversion and visuo-magnocellular processing.
Tholen N; Weidner R; Grande M; Amunts K; Heim S
Dyslexia; 2011 Aug; 17(3):268-81. PubMed ID: 21793123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic profiles of children with developmental dyslexia in a transparent orthography.
Tilanus EA; Segers E; Verhoeven L
Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Nov; 34(11):4194-202. PubMed ID: 24076984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Word length, phonemic, and visual similarity effects in poor and normal readers.
McNeil AM; Johnston RS
Mem Cognit; 2004 Jul; 32(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 15552346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia.
Siegel LS
J Learn Disabil; 1992 Dec; 25(10):618-29. PubMed ID: 1460383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developmental surface dyslexias.
Friedmann N; Lukov L
Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1146-60. PubMed ID: 18761129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing length and frequency effects in children across modalities.
Hasenäcker J; Verra L; Schroeder S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1682-1691. PubMed ID: 30238831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Serial recall of poor readers in two presentation modalities: combined effects of phonological similarity and word length.
Irausquin RS; de Gelder B
J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Jun; 65(3):342-69. PubMed ID: 9178964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phonological similarity effects, memory span and developmental reading disorders: the nature of the relationship.
Johnston RS; Rugg MD; Scott T
Br J Psychol; 1987 May; 78 ( Pt 2)():205-11. PubMed ID: 3594090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
